Comparing Six Modeling Approaches
نویسندگان
چکیده
While there are many aspect-oriented modeling (AOM) approaches, from requirements to low-level design, it is still difficult to compare them and know under which conditions different approaches are most applicable. This comparison, however, is crucially important to unify existing AOM and more traditional object-oriented modeling (OOM) approaches and to generalize individual approaches into a comprehensive end-to-end method. Such a method 218 G. Mussbacher et al. does not yet exist. This paper reports on work done at the inaugural Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop towards the goal of identifying potential comprehensive methodologies: (i) a common, focused case study for six modeling approaches, (ii) a set of criteria applied to each of the six approaches, and (iii) the assessment results.
منابع مشابه
Comparing Experiential Approaches: Structured Language Learning Experiences versus Conversation Partners for Changing Pre-Service Teacher Beliefs
Research has shown that language teachers’ beliefs are often difficult to change through education. Experiential learning may help, but more research is needed to understand how experiential approaches shape perceptions. This study compares two approaches, conversation partners (CONV) and structured language learning experiences (SLLE), integrated into a course in language acquisition. Partici...
متن کاملComparing Smart Cities with different modeling approaches
Smart cities have attracted an extensive and increasing interest from both science and industry with an increasing number of international examples emerging from across the world. However, despite the significant role that smart cities can play to deal with recent urban challenges, the concept has been criticized for being influenced by vendor hype. There are various attempts to conceptualize s...
متن کاملOn the Scalability Criterion for Comparing Modeling Approaches
The Comparing Modeling Approaches (CMA) workshop series aims at providing a common relevant case study and a growing collection of criteria to compare different modeling approaches, from aspect-oriented to object-oriented and beyond. Among criteria to be defined and integrated, scalability is particularly relevant as the Model-Driven Engineering community identifies it as one of the main challe...
متن کاملReview and Classification of Modeling Approaches of Soil Hydrology Processes
To use soil hydrology processe (SHP) models, which have increasingly extended during the last years, comprehensive knowledge about these models and their modeling approaches seems to be necessary. The modeling approaches can be categorized as either classical or non-classical. Classical approaches mainly model the SHP through solving the general unsaturated flow (Richards) equation, numerically...
متن کاملReview and Classification of Modeling Approaches of Soil Hydrology Processes
To use soil hydrology processes (SHP) models, which have increasingly extended during the last years, comprehensive knowledge about these models and their modeling approaches seems to be necessary. The modeling approaches can be categorized as either classical or non-classical. Classical approaches mainly model the SHP through solving the general unsaturated flow (Richards) equation, numericall...
متن کامل