Identifying Peer Influence Effects in Observational Social Network Data: An Evaluation of Propensity Score Methods

نویسنده

  • Dean Eckles
چکیده

There is widespread scientific and practical interest in estimating peer influence effects for a variety of behaviors, but peer influence effects are not identifiable in most observational data. Social scientists have thus had to remain largely silent on these effects — or make inconclusive or misleading arguments for their estimates of them. The state-of-the-art research has used propensity score methods to either estimate or place an upper bound on peer influence effects. The proposed research will evaluate these methods using simulations. In particular, I will demonstrate how realistic cases missing edge data leads can lead to these methods substantially underestimating peer influence effects. This means that these estimates fail as upper bounds (i.e., fail to partially identify peer influence effects). I compare these methods with regression adjustment, which may be preferrable in such conditions.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Measuring Social Influence Without Bias

How well can statistical models disentangle the effects of social influence from homophily in observational network data, and under what conditions do they models fail?1 Many outcomes of interest to social scientists – such as obesity, political attitudes, altruism, and drug use – are highly correlated within social networks.2 However, behaviors and attitudes tend to be correlated in social net...

متن کامل

Bias and high-dimensional adjustment in observational studies of peer effects

Peer effects, in which the behavior of an individual is affected by the behavior of their peers, are posited by multiple theories in the social sciences. Other processes can also produce behaviors that are correlated in networks and groups, thereby generating debate about the credibility of observational (i.e. nonexperimental) studies of peer effects. Randomized field experiments that identify ...

متن کامل

Propensity Score Methods in Nursing Research: Take Advantage of Them but Proceed With Caution.

Intervention research on health outcomes is important to advancing the nursing science. Using randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to estimate intervention (or treatment) effects is optimal for this purpose. Unfortunately, for practical or ethical reasons, RCTs are often not feasible, and thus, researchers often rely on observational or non-RCT data to estimate treatment effects. Such practice p...

متن کامل

Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies.

Causal effect modeling with naturalistic rather than experimental data is challenging. In observational studies participants in different treatment conditions may also differ on pretreatment characteristics that influence outcomes. Propensity score methods can theoretically eliminate these confounds for all observed covariates, but accurate estimation of propensity scores is impeded by large nu...

متن کامل

An Application of Non-response Bias Reduction Using Propensity Score Methods

‎In many statistical studies some units do not respond to a number or all of the questions‎. ‎This situation causes a problem called non-response‎. ‎Bias and variance inflation are two important consequences of non-response in surveys‎. ‎Although increasing the sample size can prevented variance inflation‎, ‎but cannot necessary adjust for the non-response bias‎. ‎Therefore a number of methods ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010