Promiscuity Drives Self-Referent Kin Recognition
نویسندگان
چکیده
Kin selection theory has been one of the most significant advances in our understanding of social behavior . However, the discovery of widespread promiscuity has challenged the evolutionary importance of kin selection because it reduces the benefit associated with helping nestmates . This challenge would be resolved if promiscuous species evolved a self-referent kin-recognition mechanism that enables individuals to differentiate kin and nonkin . Here, we take advantage of an asymmetry in the level of promiscuity among males of alternative life histories in the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). We show that, as a consequence of this asymmetry, offspring of "parental" males have a high level of relatedness to nestmates, whereas offspring of "cuckolder" males have a low level of relatedness to nestmates. We find that offspring of parentals do not use a direct recognition mechanism to discriminate among nestmates, whereas offspring of cuckolders use kin recognition by self-referent phenotype matching to differentiate between kin and nonkin. Furthermore, we estimate that the cost of utilizing such self-referent kin recognition is equivalent to a relatedness (R) of at least 0.06. These results provide compelling evidence for adaptive use of kin recognition by self-referent phenotype matching and confirm the importance of kinship in social behavior.
منابع مشابه
Microtubule Mechanics: A Little Flexibility Goes a Long Way
1. Hamilton, W.D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour I & II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–16 and 17–52. 2. Hain, T.J.A., and Neff, B.D. (2006). Promiscuity drives self-referent kin recognition. Curr. Biol. 16, 1807–1811. 3. Sherman, P.W., Reeve, H.K., and Pfennig, D.W. (1997). Recognition systems. In Behavioural Ecology, Fourth edition, J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies, eds. (Malden, MA: Bla...
متن کاملHuman kin recognition is self- rather than family-referential.
Inclusive fitness theory predicts that organisms will tend to help close kin more than less related individuals. In a variety of birds and mammals, relatives are recognized by comparing their phenotype to an internal representation or template, which might be learned through either repeated exposure to family members or self-inspection. Mirrors are ubiquitous now, but were absent during our evo...
متن کاملSelf-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.
In most birds and mammals, young are raised in family groups. The phenotypes of nestmates and parents are thus reliable cues for recognition of conspecifics and kin. However, in some species, young develop alone, or in broods of mixed relatedness (e.g. because of multiple paternity or maternity), or among heterospecifics or unrelated conspecifics (brood parasites). Under these circumstances, th...
متن کاملSelf-referent phenotype matching and long-term maintenance of kin recognition
Please cite this article in press as: Mateo, Behaviour (2010), doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.201 Self-referential phenotype matching, or using one’s own cues as a referent for recognizing kin, is expected in species with multiple paternity or maternity to discriminate among full siblings and halfsiblings, or in nepotistic contexts to accurately assess relatedness. It would also facilitate optimal inbre...
متن کاملKin discrimination and altruism in the larvae of a solitary insect.
Kin selection theory predicts altruism between related individuals, which requires the ability to recognize kin from non-kin. In insects, kin discrimination associated with altruistic behaviour is well-known in clonal and social species but in very few solitary insects. Here, we report that the solitary larvae of a non-social insect Aleochara bilineata Gyll. (Coleoptera; Staphylinidae) show kin...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Current Biology
دوره 16 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006