Standards of Judicial Conduct— the First Annual Chief Justice Joseph Weintraub Lecture

ثبت نشده
چکیده

It is fitting that Rutgers Law School has inaugurated this lecture series honoring Chief Justice Joseph Weintraub. The school represents the state's commitment to maintain the excellence of the bar, which is perhaps the most effective means for maintaining the excellence of the bench, the twin goals which the late Chief Justice valued above all. As a holder of the office to which he brought national recognition, I have been asked to give the first of these lectures. I am honored to do so. There have been many great judges in New Jersey's judicial system. Chief Justice Weintraub, however, was one of the giants of that system, and all of us who now serve have been affected by him. He contributed substantially to much that is good in our system, and perhaps more than anything, to our standards of judicial conduct. Today, by examining that subject, I think we honor him in a way he would have wanted. I think he would appreciate the fact that since his departure as Chief Justice in 1973, the record of the Judiciary has been superb, substantially because of his efforts, continued, of course, by his successors. What he would appreciate most, though, is that despite our undiminished confidence in the independence and integrity of our Judiciary, we recognize today that the time has come for a rededication to those standards, a renewed commitment to his standards, and above all, the time has come for a reexamination of the basis for our unparalleled record of good behavior, to make sure its foundations remain secure. Though the record would allow it, we will not take judicial conduct for granted. It is much too

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Science and judicial proceedings--seventy-six years on.

The intersection of law and science, particularly in relation to causality and the legal concept of causation, were of considerable interest to Sir Owen Dixon. In this article, revisiting Dixon's 1933 lecture "Science and Judicial Proceedings", the Chief Justice refers to Dixon's deep interest in science and the issues to which it can give rise in legal proceedings. The 1933 lecture followed sh...

متن کامل

Whose Rules of Professional Conduct Should Govern Lawyers in Federal Court and How Should the Rules Be Created

At present, the rules of professional conduct applied in federal judicial proceedings vary from district to district. In reaction to this problem, the Judicial Conference of the United States is studying the question of whether a uniform set of rules of professional conduct should apply in federal judicial proceedings and, if so, what the nature of the rules should be and how they should be dev...

متن کامل

The Forging of Judicial Autonomy: Political Entrepreneurship and the Reforms of William

In his first four years as Chief Justice of the United States, William Howard Taft convinced Congress to pass two reform bills that substantially enhanced the power of the federal courts, the Supreme Court, and the Chief Justice. In this article, I explore the causes and the consequences of those reforms. I detail how Taft’s political entrepreneurship— specifically the building of reputations, ...

متن کامل

The study of cultural barriers to women access to family justice

Access to justice is a concept that implies the practical and operational dimension of accessing individuals in judicial institutions and solving their legal problems.Equality of access to justice for all segments of society is really important, but most women have faced difficulties in accessing judicial institutions, especially in family matters.The emphasis of this paper is on the impact of ...

متن کامل

Gloss , Constitutional Conventions , and the Judicial Separation of Powers

Scholars have increasingly focused on the relevance of post-Founding historical practice to discern the separation of powers between Congress and the executive branch, and the Supreme Court has recently endorsed the relevance of such practice. Much less attention has been paid, however, to the relevance of historical practice to discerning the separation of powers between the political branches...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005