Provisionally Forthcoming: Organization Science Interorganizational Trust, Governance Choice, and Exchange Performance
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper looks at when and how preexisting interorganizational trust influences the choice of governance and in turn the performance of exchange relationships. We theorize that preexisting interorganizational trust complements the choice of governance mode (make, ally, or buy) and also promotes substitution effects on governance mode choice while impacting exchange performance. We evaluate hypotheses using a novel three-stage switching regression model and a sample of 222 component-sourcing arrangements of two assemblers in the automobile industry. Analysis of our data broadly supports our hypotheses. High levels of preexisting interorganizational trust increased the probability that a less formal, and thus less costly, mode of governance was chosen over a more formal one. This finding suggests a substitution effect of interorganizational trust on governance mode choice that in turn shapes exchange performance. We also found a complementary effect of trust on performance: regardless of the governance mode chosen for an exchange, trust enhanced exchange performance. Additional evidence of the complementary effect of trust on performance was that trust somewhat reduced interorganizational conflict.
منابع مشابه
Interorganizational-trust; the choice of make, buy, or ally; and the performance of interorganizational relationships in the us auto industry
This paper investigates the implications of interorganizational-trust for the performance of exchange relationships and considers the role of varying antecedents of trust on this performance. It develops a theory of the relationship between exchange performance and two distinct sources of interorganizational-trust—trust arising out of past interactions or the institutional environment that exis...
متن کاملSafeguarding Interorganizational Performance and Continuity Under Ex Post Opportunism
Opportunism is a central construct in exchange theory. Economists contend that despite the firm’s best efforts to erect governance structures that reduce opportunism and preserve outcomes, there is always some opportunism that remains once the transaction is in place. Despite this, there are few studies that systematically investigate the safeguarding efficacy of relationship attributes in the ...
متن کاملAlternative Origins to Interorganizational Trust: An Interdependence Perspective on the Shadow of the Past and the Shadow of the Future
Despite the widespread acceptance of trust as an informal governance institution, our understanding of its origins is nascent. Our review of the literature identified two distinct explanations: Trust emerges from either a shadow of the past (i.e., prior history) or a shadow of the future (i.e., expectations of continuity). In this paper we develop and empirically examine a third perspective: Th...
متن کاملTrust as a Governance Mechanism in Internet-based Interorganizational Cooperative Relationships
In a world of increasing complexity and situational variety, business-to-business collaboration based on real time information pooling is thought to be central for optimization of the value creation process. The qualities of the Internet render possible a simultaneous exchange of information among an unlimited number of firms, causing both academics and practitioners to assert that inter-firm a...
متن کاملForgiveness in Vertical Relationships: Incentive and Termination Effects
Two types of contractual solutions have been proposed for resolving incentive conflicts in vertical relationships: formal and relational (i.e., enforceable or not by third parties). Much is known about the optimal structure of formal contracts, but relatively little is known about the structure of relational contracts. We study a core feature of the latter: the conditions leading to continuatio...
متن کامل