Assessment, evaluation and a comparison of planned and unplanned walk trails in coastal south-western Australia
نویسندگان
چکیده
Three walk trails, the ‘Bibbulmun Track’ in West Cape Howe National Park and The Bald Head and Peak Head trails, in Torndirrup National Park were compared and evaluated using a problem assessment method. Indicators used to categorise trail degradation in the problem-assessment-trail-census included trail depth, excessive width, root exposure and trail proliferation. Other environmental variables measured in the trail assessment were slope, soil type and trail-side vegetation. Maintenance features such as boardwalks, steps, water bars and signs were assigned a condition and effectiveness rating. The most prevalent degradation problems on the assessed trails were soil erosion, exposed roots and excessive width. Trail proliferation was problematic in sections of indistinct trail or where a view could be accessed. The Bald Head and Peak Head trails were highly degraded compared to the assessed section of the Bibbulmun Track, which has been subject to a higher level of planning and management intervention. An evaluation of past management actions in relation to present trail conditions for all three trails indicates that trail alignment following natural contours and the installation of maintenance features such as board-walks, water-bars and steps on sloped sections are crucial to sustainable trail management. The utility of a trail problem assessment method developed in mountainous areas of the US has worked well in the assessment of sandy coastal walking trails, with the monitoring of trail conditions recommended as part of a sustainable trail management program and made possible due to the data that has been generated during this trail assessment.
منابع مشابه
Changes in the soil micro-topography of two coastal hiking trails in south-western Australia
Two coastal walk trails in south-western Australia were subjected to a specific soil erosion and microtopography assessment between 2004–2007. A point intercept (PIN) frame was used to evaluate change over time to the trail profile. Estimates of soil loss are quantified and discussed in relation to previous historical use and a lack of appropriate management intervention. The results show that ...
متن کاملPolicy, Theory, and Evaluation: Stop Mixing the Fruit Salad; Comment on “Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia”
The study of Health in All Policies (HiAP) is gaining momentum. Authors are increasingly turning to wide swathes of political and social theory to frame (Program) Theory Based (or Informed) Evaluation (TBE) approaches. TBE for HiAP is not only prudent, it adds a level of elegance and insight to the research toolbox. However, it is still necessary to organize theoretical thinking appropriately. ...
متن کاملLong term coastal erosion and shoreline positions of Sri Lanka
Coastal zone of Sri Lanka is a key to sustainable development of the country. The erosion of country’s coastal zone has been identified as a long standing problem. Therefore, coastal sediment dynamics around the country has to be identified to develop an appropriate coastal zone management plan. Remote sensing and GIS techniques can be used for quantitative and qualitative analyses of coastal p...
متن کاملDeveloping a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia
Background The importance of evaluating policy processes to achieve health equity is well recognised but such evaluation encounters methodological, theoretical and political challenges. This paper describes how a program theorybased evaluation framework can be developed and tested, using the example of an evaluation of the South Australian Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiative. Methods A f...
متن کاملIncluding Health in Environmental Assessments of Major Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Documentary Analysis
Background Transport policy and practice impacts health. Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) are regulated public policy mechanisms that can be used to consider the health impacts of major transport projects before they are approved. The way health is considered in these environmental assessments (EAs) is not well known. This research asked: How and to what extent was human health considere...
متن کامل