‘Rational’ Theories of Voter Turnout: A Review
نویسنده
چکیده
The paradox between an individual’s decisions to head to the polls and the absence of strictly rational arguments for this action has intrigued – and troubled – many scholars.The present article surveys various theoretical contributions to resolve this paradox of (not) voting. We assess these approaches based on their ability to explain a number of ‘stylised facts’ with respect to voter turnout.The main conclusion is that straying away from the behavioural assumptions of the Downsian model provides more realistic models and leads to promising predictions as to the individual’s decision to head to the polls. Incorporating the role of (social) groups and learning in particular can be regarded as important strides towards understanding the individual’s decision to cast a vote.
منابع مشابه
Explaining voter turnout patterns: An information theory
Voting research is rich in empirical regularities yet a parsimonious theory of voter turnout that can match the facts has proven to be elusive. This paper argues that voter turnout patterns can be explained by extending the traditional rational voter model to include limited information. A model is presented in which utility-ma~ximizing consumers receive higher payoffs from voting the more conf...
متن کاملCommunity Size, Heterogeneity and Voter Turnouts
Numerous studies have found a negative relationship between the closeness of an election, the size of the electorate and voter turnout. It is often claimed that this relationship supports the rational voter hypothesis, with closeness and size proxying for the decisiveness of a vote. We offer a different interpretation. Larger communities are more heterogeneous than smaller ones, and turnouts ar...
متن کاملVoting as a Rational Choice: Why and How People Vote to Improve the Well-Being of Others
For voters with ‘social’ preferences, the expected utility of voting is approximately independent of the size of the electorate, suggesting that rational voter turnouts can be substantial even in large elections. Less important elections are predicted to have lower turnout, but a feedback mechanism keeps turnout at a reasonable level under a wide range of conditions. The main contributions of t...
متن کاملA Theory of the Evolution of Voting: Turnout Dynamics and the Importance of Groups
Rational actor game theoretic models have had a longstanding challenge trying to explain voter turnout in the mass electorate. We analyze how partial turnout can be addressed and predicted by mechanisms in evolutionary game theory. We present two models at opposite ends of the spectrum of possible evolutionary models and show realistic partial voter turnout can be generated by either. The first...
متن کاملThe Paradox of Voter Participation? A Laboratory Study
It is widely believed that rational choice theory is grossly inconsistent with empirical observations about voter turnout. We report the results of an experiment designed to test the voter turnout predictions of the rational choice Palfrey-Rosenthal model of participation with asymmetric information. We find that the three main comparative statics predictions are observed in the data: the size ...
متن کامل