On The Centrality of Policy Outcomes in Dynamic Majoritarian Bargaining Games
نویسنده
چکیده
We analyze an inÞnitely repeated divide-the-dollar bargaining game with an endogenous reversion point. In each session a new dollar is divided among three legislators according to the proposal of a randomly recognized member if a majority prefer so or according to previous periods allocation otherwise. We characterize a Markov Perfect Nash Equilibrium of this game and study the resultant equilibrium dynamics. Contrary to the results of Baron, 1996, for one-dimensional ideological spaces, or the intuition in Baron and Herron, 1999, for a Þnitely repeated analogue of the game over a two-dimensional space, outcomes in distributive policy spaces are considerably more extreme. Irrespective of the discount factor or the initial division of the dollar, equilibrium outcomes are absorbed in an irreducible set that has an empty intersection with the uncovered set (Miller, 1980, Epstein, 1998).
منابع مشابه
Transfer of Bargaining Power Sources in Oil Trade Games
Bargaining Power is one of the important issues in oil trade negotiations. In this paper two effective factors in bargaining power i.e. patient time to deal and outside options of each player have been considered. The necessary relations for exchange of sources in negotiation have been derived.
متن کاملPricing and Advertising Decisions in a Three-level Supply Chain with Nash, Stackelberg and Cooperative Games
Pricing and advertising are two important marketing strategies in the supply chain management which lead to customer demand’s increase and therefore higher profit for members of supply chains. This paper considers advertising, and pricing decisions simultaneously for a three-level supply chain with one supplier, one manufacturer and one retailer. The amount of market demand is influenced ...
متن کاملA new old solution for weak tournaments
This note uncovers new properties of the von Neumann-Morgenstern solution in weak tournaments and majoritarian games. We propose a new procedure for the construction of choice sets from weak tournaments, based on dynamic stability criteria. The idea is to analyze dynamic versions of the tournament game introduced by Laffond, Laslier and Le Breton (1993) [The bipartisan set of a tournament game....
متن کاملDynamic Matching and Bargaining Games: A General Approach
Dynamic matching and bargaining games provide models of decentralized trading with frictions. A central objective of the literature is to investigate how equilibrium outcomes depend on the level of the frictions. In particular, will the outcome become e¢ cient when frictions become small? Existing speci cations of such games give di¤erent answers. To investigate what causes these di¤erence we i...
متن کاملSubgame Perfect Equilibria in Majoritarian Bargaining
We study three-person bargaining games with discounting, where an alternative is accepted if it is approved by a majority of players. We characterize the set of subgame perfect equilibrium payoffs and show that for any proposal in the space of possible agreements there exists a discount factor such that given the proposal is made and accepted by one of the players in period zero. Also we constr...
متن کامل