A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews
نویسنده
چکیده
NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (NHS QIS) is committed to equality and diversity. This document, and the research on which it is based, have been assessed for any likely impact on the six equality groups defined by age, gender, race/ethnicity, religion/faith, disability and sexual orientation. For a summary of the equality and diversity impact assessment, please see www.nhshealthquality.org NHS QIS consents to the photocopying, electronic reproduction by 'uploading' or 'downloading' from the website, retransmission, or other copying of this document for the purpose of implementation in NHSScotland and educational and 'not-for-profit' purposes. No reproduction by or for commercial organisations is permitted without the express written permission of NHS QIS. A guide to synthesising qualitative research for researchers undertaking health technology assessments and systematic reviews. 2010.
منابع مشابه
Real world reviews: a beginner's guide to undertaking systematic reviews of public health policy interventions.
BACKGROUND The systematic review is becoming an increasingly popular and established research method in public health. Obtaining systematic review skills are therefore becoming a common requirement for most public health researchers and practitioners. However, most researchers still remain apprehensive about conducting their first systematic review. This is often because an 'ideal' type of syst...
متن کاملMethods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
BACKGROUND There is a growing recognition of the value of synthesising qualitative research in the evidence base in order to facilitate effective and appropriate health care. In response to this, methods for undertaking these syntheses are currently being developed. Thematic analysis is a method that is often used to analyse data in primary qualitative research. This paper reports on the use of...
متن کاملIssues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.
OBJECTIVES (1) Methodological research has few well-defined tools and processes analogous to those available for reviews and data collection in substantive health technology assessment. (2) This project was set up to obtain researchers' and others' views on the innovative projects on research methodology under the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme and the usefulness of the research. (3...
متن کاملRisk to researchers in qualitative research on sensitive topics: issues and strategies.
Traditionally, risk assessments in research have been limited to examining the risks to the research participants. Although doing so is appropriate and important, there is growing recognition that undertaking research can pose risks to researchers as well. A grounded theory study involving a range of researchers who had undertaken qualitative health research on a sensitive topic was completed. ...
متن کاملMetasynthesis : a guide to knitting smoke
Since the seminal production of Noblit and Hares’ book Meta-ethnography published in 1988, the quest for an optimal route to synthesising qualitative evidence has gained momentum. Theoretical arguments in this area range diametrically from the impossibility of progressing knowledge based on qualitative evidence in the absence of such synthesis, to the impossibility of synthesising knowledge tha...
متن کامل