Group Decision Making in Collaborative Modeling
نویسنده
چکیده
The need for negotiation and decision making among collaborative modelers stems from their desire to reconcile their different positions, priorities and preferences. This requires them to engage in an argumentative negotiation process so as to achieve consensus. A number of methods can be used to aggregate their judgements and priorities thus helping them to reach consensus. In this paper we show how the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) can be used to help modelers reach consensus about the quality of the different modeling aspects in a collaborative modeling process. Insights derived from this approach could be used to aid modelers reach consensus about the quality of the different aspects in a collaborative modeling session through a decision making negotiation process.
منابع مشابه
Assessment of Prospective Memory, Risky Decision-Making, Collaborative Decision-Making among Individuals with Morning and Evening Circadian Typology
Introduction: Biological aspects of personality have an influence on people psychological dimensions. The present study was aimed to compare prospective memory, risky decision-making, collaborative decision-making between individuals with morning and evening circadian typology. Methods: For this purpose, a study with quantitative methodology approach and a descriptive design was conceived. T...
متن کاملAnalyzing a Collaborative Modeling Game
Analysing the modeling process within collaborative (group) modeling sessions is not a trivial task. In such environments, there are many things that influence the way the modeling process is carried along. These include the skills and expertise of the modelers, the communication between them, the decision-making process, rules and goals driving the process etc. To study and support such a coll...
متن کاملCollaborative Modeling: Towards a Meta-model for Analysis and Evaluation
In this paper we discuss a meta-model for the analysis and evaluation of collaborative modeling sessions. In the first part of the meta-model, we use an analysis framework which reveals a triad of rules, interactions and models. This framework, which is central in driving the modeling process, helps us look inside the modeling process with the aim of understanding it better. The second part of ...
متن کاملEffects of Methadone Maintenance Treatment on Decision-Making Processes in Heroin-Abusers: A Cognitive Modeling Analysis
A B S T R A C TIntroduction: Although decision-making processes have become a principal target of study among addiction researchers, few researches are published according to effects of different treatment methods on the cognitive processes underlying decision making up to now. Utilizing cognitive modeling method, in this paper we examine the effects of Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) on ...
متن کاملE-Participation: Modeling and Developing with Trust for Decision Making Supplement Purpose
ICT has been employed in various areas, including eParticipation to support citizen participation and achieve democracy ideal. Trust as a social behavior can be used as a method to model preferences and facilitate better participation and interaction in a decision making within a group of decision makers. In this paper we present literatures survey related to eParticipation and trust in compute...
متن کامل