The Strategy of Dominant-Party Politics: Electoral Institutions and Election Outcomes in Africa
نویسنده
چکیده
The Strategy of Dominant Party Politics: Electoral Institutions and Election Outcomes in Africa Politics in many African countries today is defined by simultaneous differences and similarities. What we mean by difference is that the rules under which elections are conducted are different across countries. Some countries, Botswana and Zimbabwe, conduct elections under first-past-the-post plurality systems while others, like Namibia and Burkina Faso use list PR systems. In terms of similarities across countries, despite the variety of electoral rules employed, election outcomes in the above mentioned African nations are quite similar. Specifically, almost all legislative elections in Africa result in some form of dominant party systems, and this is true for those where dominance is sustained by authoritarian politics as well as those where transitions to democracy have occurred. While a number of explanations for this phenomenon exist in the literature, we take a step back and examine the strategies that governing parties use to maintain their electoral dominance. We accomplish this by using data from available Afro Barometer surveys and mapping how countries are different in terms of the groups that support their dominant parties.
منابع مشابه
Social factors affecting electoral behavior: Presidential election in Mazandaran province
The main objective of this research is the sociological study of the impact of social influences on electoral behavior in Iran's presidential election among citizens living in Mazandaran province. This research is descriptive-analytic and survey is carried out using a researcher-made questionnaire. Using Cochran's formula, 384 individuals were selected as sample size and then statistical sampli...
متن کاملElectoral Ethics in Imam Khomeini's thought
Every society has oriented itself towards a governing method concerning the socio-cultural conditions and with the inclusion of different historical-ideological periods and has accepted it as its governmental plan. Iranian society is not an exception to this general rule. Throughout different historical stages, such as the government of Safavid, the Constitution Movement, and despotic g...
متن کاملInstitutional Change and Persistence : The Evolution of Poland ’ s Electoral System , 1989 – 2001 Kenneth Benoit
Electoral systems are uniquely distributive political institutions that shape political outcomes, yet are themselves endogenously shaped outcomes of political choices. In Poland, party system development has involved not only parties adapting to electoral institutions in each election, but also parties modifying these institutions prior to every election. We model electoral system change as dri...
متن کاملThird-Party Actors and the Success of Democracy: How Electoral Commissions, Courts, and Observers Shape Incentives for Electoral Manipulation and Post-Election Protests
When and how do third-party actors—most prominently electoral commissions, courts, and observers—contribute to the integrity of the electoral process? We approach these questions by studying how third-party actors shape politicians’ incentives to comply with the outcomes of elections. Third parties are most beneficial in close elections, when the threat of a post-election confrontation alone fa...
متن کاملInstitutional Change and Persistence: The Origins and Evolution of Poland's Electoral System 1989-2001
Institutions shape political outcomes, yet institutions themselves are endogenously shaped outcomes of political choices. Electoral systems are a unique class of distributive institutions that fundamentally shape political competition and political outcomes in democratic polities. Our paper examines the origins and subsequent changes to the Polish electoral system from the semi-free election in...
متن کامل