How to Critique a Published Article
نویسنده
چکیده
Few replies get published. Many that do get published could be more effective. A reply can be effective only if it is published, readable, and credible. This article suggests guidelines for writing good replies. The guidelines begin with things to keep in mind—for example, that you might be wrong—and things to do before you begin to write. The latter include considering not responding, considering alternative viewpoints, and distancing yourself from the task. Things to do while writing include using the principle of charity, avoiding ad hominem and emotionally laden arguments, and keeping the rebuttal short. After completing the first draft, you should put it aside for awhile as well as get a second opinion. A good reply complements rather than discredits the argument of the target author.
منابع مشابه
Model of Process Critique of Contemporary Residential Works Based on the components: "Mission, Objectives, Functional Needs and Concepts
The formation of a designer's personality and the acquisition of design skills are dependent on specific components and variables, such as observation and sampling, analysis and handling of samples, direct involvement and impregnation with the design problem. Architectural critique and analysis of the works of the past and successful and unsuccessful examples have always played a key role in ar...
متن کاملCritique and evaluation of published articles quality of Health Sciences qualitative Researches Journal based on CASP scale
Introduction: Recently, rate of journals and published article in the medical sciences has grown, but the quality of these journals and published articles should be criticized. Therefore, this study was conducted with the aim of criticizing quality of published studies in the qualitative research in health sciences journal based on the CASP scale. Methods: This study has been done with a cro...
متن کاملCritique of Research Book (Literature)/A Critique of Kimia of Rumi’s Haram, Sadaf Golmoradi
A Critique of Kimia of Rumi’s Haram Sadaf Golmoradi/ Professor at Tehran Farhangian University, [email protected] Abstract The present research is aimed at introducing and reviewing Kimia of Rumi’s Haram. Although the book does not mention in the title that it is in face a critique but we see that it is an essay based on "... the critique of novels Kimiakhatoon, Rumi’s Daughter, and the ...
متن کاملCritique of Manuscript-Correction/ The Role of Editors in Presenting the Author: A review of Toghray Mashhadi's biography in his newly published Book of Essays, Fatima Mehri
The Role of Editors in Presenting the Author A Review of Toghray Mashhadi's Biography in His Newly Published Book of Essays Fatemeh Mehri Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University [email protected] Abstract Researchers in the field of editing and correction manuscripts consider the writing of introductions as part of the correction process. T...
متن کاملVendantic view on life and consciousness: BN Shanta is correct
The explanation for Vedanta offered by Bhakti Niskama Santa (BNS)1 is valid from both scientific and philosophical grounds. It seems that the published critique of Gustavo Caetano-Anollés (GCA)2 to Shanta's paper is purely emotional and does not have any valid scientific or philosophical justification. In his rebuttal to Caetano-Anollés's critique, Shanta3 highlighted how the concept of 'Organi...
متن کاملPhilosophy, Art and Critique: A (short) conversation with the “other”
The article sketches a nexus between philosophy, art (poetry) and critique with a particular emphasis on the contribution of classical Muslim philosophers. At the same time, it demonstrates how luminaries such as Omar Khayyam and Ibn Sina, contributed to the renewal of philosophy as a freedom seeking exercise and as a means to pursue happiness through knowledge. In the second&nbs...
متن کامل