Patients' evaluations of European general practice--revisited after 11 years.

نویسندگان

  • Davorina Petek
  • Beat Künzi
  • Janko Kersnik
  • Joachim Szecsenyi
  • Michel Wensing
چکیده

BACKGROUND In the last decade many things have changed in healthcare systems, primary care practices and populations. OBJECTIVE To describe evaluations of general practice care by patients with a chronic illness in 2009 and compare these with a previous study done in 1998. DESIGN A descriptive analysis of patients' evaluations, using data from the European practice assessment Cardio study on cardiovascular patients in eight European countries in 2009. We compared these evaluations with a subgroup of patients with self-defined chronic illness from the study in 1998, using a linear regression model. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Patients' evaluation of general practice using the EUROPEP questionnaire. The EUROPEP is a 23-item validated measure of patient evaluations of general practice care. RESULTS In 2009, 7472 patients from 251 practices participated in the study with an overall response rate of 49.6%. The percentage of patients with positive evaluations (good/excellent) was 80% or higher for all items, except for the waiting time. More positive evaluations were found in older patients, patients with a longer attachment to the practice, patients with a higher self-evaluation of their health, patients with fewer mental health problems and less pain/discomfort. The comparison between 1998 and 2009 showed no overall trends for all countries combined. Whereas English patients became fairly more positive about general practice in 2009, German patients became slightly less positive, although still more positive than English patients. CONCLUSION Overall, the patients' evaluations of general practice were very positive in family practice care in the years 1998 and 2009. The trends over the years need to be carefully interpreted over time.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Patient satisfaction with availability of general practice: an international comparison.

OBJECTIVE To identify associations between the characteristics of general practitioners and practices, and patients' evaluations of the availability of general practice. DESIGN Written surveys completed by patients. SETTING General practice care in nine European countries: Denmark, Germany, The Netherlands, Norway, UK, Belgium (Flanders and Wallonia), Switzerland, Slovenia and Spain. STUD...

متن کامل

Practice Appointment Rates for High-risk Asthmatics: What could be the Predictor(s)?

Practice appointment rates could have a significant impact on national health care costs and services offered by doctors. In this respect a study was designed to determine the relationship between practice appointments and possible predictors in high-risk asthmatics. An observational retrospective analysis of the predictors for the practice appointments in asthmatic patients with at least one h...

متن کامل

Practice Appointment Rates for High-risk Asthmatics: What could be the Predictor(s)?

Practice appointment rates could have a significant impact on national health care costs and services offered by doctors. In this respect a study was designed to determine the relationship between practice appointments and possible predictors in high-risk asthmatics. An observational retrospective analysis of the predictors for the practice appointments in asthmatic patients with at least one h...

متن کامل

Feedback of patients' evaluations of general practice care: a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of feedback of patients' evaluations of care to general practitioners. DESIGN Randomised trial. SETTING General practice in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS 55 GPs and samples of 3691 and 3595 adult patients before and after the intervention, respectively. INTERVENTIONS GPs in the intervention group were given an individualised structured feedback report concern...

متن کامل

Health economics and European Renal Best Practice--is it time to bring health economics into evidence-based guideline production in Europe?

Medical management of patients with kidney disease is complex and resource intensive. In times of limited health care budgets, economic evaluations have become more important over the past few years in identifying interventions with a beneficial cost-effectiveness to maximize the benefits served from the available resources. However, integrating evidence from health-economic evaluations into cl...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care

دوره 23 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011