Collusion-proof cost sharing mechanisms (Draft)
نویسنده
چکیده
An auction type mechanism elicits the valuations for getting a good (service) from the agents, allocates some goods (service) to some agents and charge money only to the served agents. We characterize the mechanisms that are immune to three alternative types of collusion of the agents. Under full collusion, agents can coordinate misreports and transfer money between them. We show that only the fixed cost mechanisms, that offer units of good to the agents at a fixed price are immune to full collusion. On the other hand, if the utility profile is random and transfers of money between the agents are not available, agents may sign a contract and coordinate misreports ex-ante at every state of the world. We show that only sequential mechanisms are immune to this type of collusion. Finally, if the utility profile is deterministic and transfers of money between the agents are not available, a large class of mechanisms are immune to coordinated misreports of the agents. We characterize this class and show that it contains most of the mechanisms previously discussed in early literature of group strategyproof cost sharing.
منابع مشابه
Collusion-Proof Implementation of Optimal Mechanisms
A contract with multiple agents may be susceptible to collusion. We show that agents’ collusion can be prevented at no cost in a large class of circumstances with risk neutral agents — virtually all circumstances with uncorrelated types and a broad set of circumstances with correlated types. In those circumstances, an optimal outcome in the absence of collusion can be made collusion proof, in a...
متن کاملTo Be or Not to Be (Served): Cost Sharing Without Indifferences
In a cost-sharing problem, finitely many players have unknown valuations for some service, and a mechanism is sought for determining which players to serve and how to distribute the incurred cost. An ideal mechanism is collusion-resistant (elicits truthful valuations even if players could collude), budget-balanced (recovers the cost), economically efficient (trades off cost and valuations), and...
متن کاملTeam Beats Collusion∗
This paper analyzes optimal contracts in a linear hidden-action model with normally distributed returns possessing two moments that are governed jointly by two agents, who can observe each others’ effort levels and draft enforceable side–contracts on chosen effort levels and realized returns. After showing that standard constraints, resulting in incentive–contracts, may fail to ensure implement...
متن کاملRobustly Collusion-Proof Implementation
A contract with multiple agents may be susceptible to collusion. We show that agents’ collusion imposes no cost in a large class of circumstances with risk neutral agents, including both uncorrelated and correlated types. In those circumstances, any payoff the principal can attain in the absence of collusion, including the secondbest level, can be attained in the presence of collusion in a way ...
متن کاملCollusion in Organizations and Management of Conflicts through Job Design and Authority Delegation
We analyze a principal-supervisor-two agent hierarchy with supervisory efforts, provide a characterization of the equilibrium of the game, and show which regime improves efficiency between the collusion-proof regime and the lateral collusion one, under the assumptions that the principal is less informed, and that the side-trade is costly. By coping with the trade-off between the value of inform...
متن کامل