Implant removal of osteosynthesis: the Dutch practice. Results of a survey
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND The aim of this survey study was to evaluate the current opinion and practice of trauma and orthopaedic surgeons in the Netherlands in the removal of implants after fracture healing. METHODS A web-based questionnaire consisting of 44 items was sent to all active members of the Dutch Trauma Society and Dutch Orthopaedic Trauma Society to determine their habits and opinions about implant removal. RESULTS Though implant removal is not routinely done in the Netherlands, 89% of the Dutch surgeons agreed that implant removal is a good option in case of pain or functional deficits. Also infection of the implant or bone is one of the main reasons for removing the implant (> 90%), while making money was a motivation for only 1% of the respondents. In case of younger patients (< 40 years of age) only 34% of the surgeons agreed that metal implants should always be removed in this category. Orthopaedic surgeons are more conservative and differ in their opinion about this subject compared to general trauma surgeons (p = 0.002). Though the far majority removes elastic nails in children (95%).Most of the participants (56%) did not agree that leaving implants in is associated with an increased risk of fractures, infections, allergy or malignancy. Yet in case of the risk of fractures, residents all agreed to this statement (100%) whereas staff specialists disagreed for 71% (p < 0.001). According to 62% of the surgeons titanium plates are more difficult to remove than stainless steel, but 47% did not consider them safer to leave in situ compared to stainless steel. The most mentioned postoperative complications were wound infection (37%), unpleasant scarring (24%) and postoperative hemorraghe (19%). CONCLUSION This survey indicates that there is no general opinion about implant removal after fracture healing with a lack of policy guidelines in the Netherlands. In case of symptomatic patients a majority of the surgeons removes the implant, but this is not standard practice for every surgeon.
منابع مشابه
Operative Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fracturedislocations Through an Anterolateral Deltoid Split Approach
Background: Proximal humeral fracture-dislocations (PHFD) are a special entity in proximal humeral fracturetreatment. The aim of this study is to present our minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique throughan anterolateral deltoid split approach. In addition, we performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing the patientreported functional outcome and complica...
متن کاملElective implant removal in symptomatic patients after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures improves clinical outcome
BACKGROUND Operative treatment is the standard for severely displaced proximal humerus fractures, but functional impairment can persist. Retaining of the implant can be a reason and in other fracture situations has proved to ameliorate patient satisfaction. The aim of this study was to analyse the functional outcome after locking plate removal in proximal humerus fractures. METHODS In a two-y...
متن کاملPatellar Fractures: An Innovative Surgical Technique With Transosseous Suture to Avoid Implant Removal.
PURPOSE To describe a new surgical procedure and its outcomes: osteosynthesis with high-resistance sutures, avoiding metallic implants. Open sky osteosynthesis with Kirschner and cerclage wiring is the current gold standard for patella fractures. Favorable functional outcomes have been observed, although implant removal is required in many cases due to the prominent wires under the skin. New im...
متن کامل[DHS osteosynthesis for proximal femoral fractures: infectious complications].
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Evaluation of infectious complications in patients with proximal femoral fractures treated by osteosynthesis using dynamic hip screws (DHS). MATERIAL The group included 501 patients with 532 DHS procedures performed in the years 1996-2010. In 31 patients osteosynthesis was carried out bilaterally. METHODS Osteosynthesis was indicated for femoral neck fracture in 18 hips...
متن کاملTreatment of type 2 and 4 olecranon fractures with locking compression plate osteosynthesis in horses: a prospective study (2002-2008).
This prospective study describes a series of 18 olecranon fractures in 16 horses that were treated with locking compression plates (LCP). Twelve of the 18 fractures were simple (type 2), whereas six were comminuted (type 4). Six fractures were open and 12 were closed. Each horse underwent LCP osteosynthesis consisting of open reduction and application of one or two LCP. Complete fracture healin...
متن کامل