Seat Biases in Proportional Representation Systems with Thresholds
نویسندگان
چکیده
In proportional representation systems, apportionment methods are used to convert the number of votes of a party into the number of seats allocated to this party. An interesting characteristic of any such method are the seat biases, that is, the expected differences between the actual seat allocation and the ideal share of seats, separately for each party, when parties are ordered from largest to smallest. For electoral systems with a threshold, that is, with a minimum percentage of votes that parties must reach in order to be eligible to participate in the apportionment process, we show that seat biases decrease from their maximum to zero, as the threshold increases from zero to its maximum, and that all seat biases decrease linearly.
منابع مشابه
Seat biases of apportionment methods for proportional representation
In proportional representation systems, an important issue is whether a given apportionment method favors larger parties at the expense of smaller parties. For an arbitrary number of parties, ordered from largest to smallest by their vote counts, we calculate (apparently for the first time) the expected differences between the seat allocation and the ideal share of seats, separately for each pa...
متن کاملIn a comprehensive and systematic examination of democratic legislatures, Taagepera and Shugart (1989) develop a "generalized Duverger's Rule." In an exhaustive empirical analysis they find a positive relationship between district magnitude and the size
Falling into a Niche: Institutional Equilibrium between Plurality and Proportional Representation for Large Political Parties" Scholars of electoral systems (e.g., Duverger, 1954; Rae 1967) argue that a combination of electoral system and district magnitude provide the strategic incentives for political party competition. All electoral systems reward large parties with a disproportional seat bo...
متن کاملHow proportional are mixed compensatory electoral systems? Determining the necessary share of compensation mandates in mixed systems
Mixed compensatory systems (some call them “mixed-member proportional systems”), are praised for combining "the best of both worlds.” Yet, we know fairly little about their outcomes in practice. We still lack a genuine model that explains how many compensation seats are needed for the outcome to be proportional. Without this knowledge we will neither be able to estimate how many parties we expe...
متن کاملPerception thresholds for vertical vibration at the hand, seat and foot
In many occupational and leisure environments, the human body is exposed to oscillatory motions of handles, seats and floors which give rise to complex patterns of sensations. Knowledge of differences in sensitivity to the perception of vibration at the hand, seat and foot would assist the identification of sources of discomfort caused by vibration. The objective of this study was to examine th...
متن کاملDoes a Least-Preferred Candidate Win a Seat? A Comparison of Three Electoral Systems
In this paper, the differences between two variations of proportional representation (PR), open-list PR and closed-list PR, are analyzed in terms of their ability to accurately reflect voter preference. The single nontransferable vote (SNTV) is also included in the comparison as a benchmark. We construct a model of voting equilibria with a candidate who is least preferred by voters in the sense...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 27 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006