Reducing negative appendectomy: evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To study the sensitivity and the specificity for ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis, and their value to the clinician. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The negative appendectomy rate and the sensitivity and the specificity for ultrasonography and computed tomography in patients with suspected appendicitis. RESULT The diagnostic accuracy was 88% (men 95%, women 80%). Two hundred and thirty-nine patients were examined by ultrasonography preoperatively. The sensitivity for ultrasonography was 0.82 and the specificity was 0.97. Forty-nine patients were examined by computed tomography preoperatively. The sensitivity for computer tomography was 0.88 and the specificity was 0.95. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that ultrasound and computed tomography investigations on patients with suspected appendicitis are of great value. Computed tomography seems to have a higher sensitivity than ultrasound and a high specificity. In fertile women, where unnecessary surgery is best avoided, we believe that computed tomography investigation or ultrasound examination are better alternatives to surgical intervention.
منابع مشابه
Low diagnostic values of ultrasonography and negative appendectomy: still a major problem in university hospitals
Abstract Background: Misdiagnosis of the acute appendicitis may increase the rate of negative appendectomies, which involve a huge waste of resources and are sometimes associated with severe complications. Furthermore, false negative result of ultrasonography (US) could lead to perforation of appendix. Since ultrasonography is still the most common imaging technique used in Iranian appendiciti...
متن کاملAccuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosing acute appendicitis during pregnancy based on surgical findings
Background: Acute appendicitis is the most common nonobstetric surgical problem in pregnancy. Common signs and symptoms of appendicitis are less reliable during pregnancy due to physiological changes; thus, the role of imaging becomes prominent. Thus, in the present study, we aimed at assessing the accuracy of sonography in diagnosing acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Methods: ...
متن کاملCorrelation between Clinical, Sonographic and Pathologic Findings of Patients Undergoing Appendectomy
Introduction: Acute appendicitis is the most common cause of acute abdomen and is considered as a surgical emergency. Approximately, 10% of patients with acute appendicitis and delayed diagnosis can face many complications. This study was designed to examine the correlation between ultrasound and pathological findings in patients with appendicitis and aimed t...
متن کاملEvaluation of Modified Alvarado Score Combined With Ultrasonography in Decreasing Negative Appendicectomy Rate
Background And Objectives – to assess accuracy of modified Alvarado score along with aid of ultrasonography in the pre-operative diagnosis of acute appendicitis to decrease the negative appendicectomy rate. Methods-A consecutive series of 100 patients who came to emergency opd with provisional dia gnosis of acute appendicitis was evaluated with modified Alvarado score and subjected to ultrasono...
متن کاملUltrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis.
BACKGROUND Cross-sectional imaging increases accuracy in diagnosing appendicitis. We hypothesized that a radiation-free imaging pathway of ultrasonography selectively followed by MRI would not change clinical end points compared with computed tomography (CT) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed children (<18 years old) who had diagnostic imaging...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
دوره 12 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2000