Crisis Communication Saved Lives in Israel
نویسنده
چکیده
Israel launched “Operation Protective Edge” (1, 2) against Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other terrorist groups in Gaza during August–September 2014 to restore safety and security to its citizens; the operation had the limited objective of ending the continuous rocket and mortars firings and to destroy the tunnels that were dug under Israeli sovereign territory for the purpose of terror killing and kidnapping. Israelis in communities close to Gaza had become targets of intermittent shelling from Gaza for the past fourteen years. Living under fire has become a routine reality for Israeli residents causing, significant psychological trauma and anxiety, which is the intention of terrorist activity. During the operation, more than 4382 rockets were launched over Israel and more than 70% Israelis live within range of Hamas’ rockets (2). In response, Israel has developed a twolayered defensive strategy to address this ongoing situation: first, an active-defense system with the “Iron Dome” designed to intercept and destroy rockets that set to land in populated areas; second, a passivedefense system based on air alerts sirens, Urban Search And Rescue teams, medical system including hospitals, Emergency Medical Service, influencing and directing public behavior through crisis communication. While many people were aware that “Iron Dome” intercepted most of the incoming rockets that would have caused many Israeli casualties, few may be aware of the second strategy that has spawned a sophisticated civil defense culture. That may be constructive in understanding how Israel emerged from the conflict with relatively few civilian casualties and how other countries could adapt this system if ever under sustained terror attack. The aim of crisis communication is to enable the public to be knowledgeable concerning recommended behavior during an attack and minimize the disruption of normal life. Considering the inability of “Iron Dome” system to intercept 100% of the rockets aimed at the civilian population, crisis communication is an important component of this second layer of civil defense. The Iron Dome system intercepted 692 (2) of the rockets, whose trajectory would land in populated areas, resulting in a high rate of successful interceptions (90%). Because of the two-tiered method, the loss of human life was very limited. Five civilians were killed and 684 Israeli civilians were injured inflicted mostly by light injuries. The Israeli Civil Protection (Home front Command) educated the Israeli public concerning the techniques and procedures they should implement during a rocket attack; individuals were required to enter the best available protected spaces depending upon their location. The time given ranged from 15 s in areas near the Gaza Strip, and up to 90 s in areas more than 40 km from the Gaza Strip. These guidelines, in conjunction with the full cooperation of the civilian population, saved a significant number of lives, reducing casualties as well as the volume of casualties needing medical assistance. Research on crisis communication has demonstrated that pre-emptive knowledge has a dramatic impact on the public’s designated behavior to protect themselves during crises and reduces anxiety (3, 4). The crisis communication platform was achieved by activating a pre-planned system immediately upon the onset of this operation. The system consisted of multiple components including call centers (which received more than 330,000 calls during the first 45 days of operation, with a high load of 40,000 calls during 1 day) (5); guidelines in newspapers; websites (in several languages with more than 1.65 million enterers), and social media (Facebook and Twitter). The new social media help to deliver Civil Protection messages to the public; however, some individuals spread rumors, mostly through WhatsApp. Therefore, there was a need to monitor the new media and to refute rumors as fast as possible. The Civil Protection prepared short clips that provided messages, instructions, and information regarding vital services. They also broadcasted in various languages, constantly transmitting on YouTube. Special programs were prepared for children using well-known characters to disseminate child-friendly messages. National spokespersons were nominated, and each assigned to the main television and radio news channels. These spokespersons were the Civil Protection representatives in these channels; they spoke uniformly in clear, simple messaging that provided life-saving information, and supported the public by calming them. The advanced training and coordination of the three main spokespersons in the media channels facilitated a quick and smooth process throughout the operation. The spokespersons participating most of the media programs in a 24/7 span time frame, during the days of the operation. They became known faces to the public. During the operation, there was a significant increase in the volume of public listening and network viewing, allowing the
منابع مشابه
Valuing “ Lives Saved ” vs . “ Life - Years Saved ”
There is long-standing debate whether to count “lives saved” or “life-years saved” when evaluating policies to reduce mortality risk. Historically, the two approaches have been applied in different domains. Environmental and transportation policies have often been evaluated using lives saved, while life-years saved has been the preferred metric in other areas of public health including medicine...
متن کاملThe increase in lives saved, injuries prevented, an cost savings if seat belt use rose to at least 90 percent in all States.
The 1,652 additional lives saved in all 38 States and the District of Columbia resulting from the increase in seat belt use would represent an increase of 11 percent above the estimate of lives saved by seat belts (15,147) for 2007. Over 50 percent of the total benefits in lives saved (842 out of the total of 1,652 lives saved), non-fatal injuries saved (22,677 out of the total of 39,486 non-fa...
متن کاملThe dramatic impact of Coronavirus outbreak on air quality: Has it saved as much as it has killed so far?
The outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was first reported from Wuhan, China, on December 31st, 2019. As the number of coronavirus infections has exceeded 100,000 with toll deaths of about 5000 worldwide as of early March, 2020, scientists and researchers are racing to investigate the nature of this virus and evaluate the short and long term effects of this disease. Despite it...
متن کاملComparing models of helper behavior to actual practice in telephone crisis intervention: a Silent Monitoring Study of Calls to the U.S. 1-800-SUICIDE Network.
Models of telephone crisis intervention in suicide prevention and best practices were developed from a literature review and surveys of crisis centers. We monitored 2,611 calls to 14 centers using reliable behavioral ratings to compare actual interventions with the models. Active listening and collaborative problem-solving models describe help provided. Centers vary greatly in the nature of int...
متن کاملA method for estimating maternal and newborn lives saved from health-related investments funded by the UK government Department for International Development using the Lives Saved Tool
BACKGROUND In 2010, the UK Government Department for International Development (DFID) committed through its 'Framework for results for reproductive, maternal and newborn health (RMNH)' to save 50,000 maternal lives and 250,000 newborn lives by 2015. They also committed to monitoring the performance of this portfolio of investments to demonstrate transparency and accountability. Methods currentl...
متن کامل