Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Laparoscopy-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES To compare the feasibility of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) in the treatment of benign gynecologic diseases and to determine the selection criteria for each technique. METHODS This was a retrospective medical records review of 168 patients who underwent TLH or LAVH performed by one surgeon. A chi-square test was used to compare the difference between the TLH and LAVH groups. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for the relationship between the clinico-demographic factors of the patients. RESULTS There were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to age, parity, history of abdominal delivery, body mass index, and indication for hysterectomy. The operative time was similar between the 2 groups (P>.99). The uterine weight was greater in the LAVH group compared to the TLH group (P<.01). Ten patients were converted from TLH to LAVH, because of a large uterus and/or a lower segmental mass on the uterus, making it difficult to expose the Koh cup rim contour. CONCLUSIONS TLH and LAVH are safe, feasible methods by which to perform a hysterectomy. LAVH is preferred in patients with a mass involving the lower segment or a relatively large uterus.