A comparative study of healthcare and placement needs among older forensic patients in a high secure versus medium/low secure hospital setting.

It is predicted that there will be a significant growth in the population aged over 65 years in the U.K., from 15.9% in 2000 to 23.3% in 2050, with the fastest growth rate being among the oldest old (United Nations, 2005). In line with such growth, there will be a commensurate increase in the population of older people suffering from psychiatric conditions. This will lead to a demand for increased health care services and the need for reorganization and prioritization of resources channeled into health care for this group. An area in healthcare provision for older people which is both under-researched and suffers from a lack of adequate services in the U.K. are services for older psychiatric patients with a history of offending or forensic patients (Nnatu et al., 2005). The older forensic offenders are more likely to have complex medical problems, complex psychopathology with much co-morbidity and a high degree of alcohol misuse and dependence (Lewis et al., 2006). Studies from the U.K. examining older patients referred or admitted to forensic psychiatric services (Coid et al., 2002; Curtice et al., 2003; Tomar et al., 2004) report that whilst the numbers are low, there is high prevalence of psychiatric morbidity, and there is no proper service provision for such a population. The authors suggest that their needs may be met in health care rather than in criminal justice services. Neither health care nor criminal justice services, however, have made adequate service provision for this group. Services for older forensic psychiatric patients are in their infancy with most such services being in the private health care sector (Yorsten and Taylor, 2006). Recent literature on assessment of needs, and placement requirements in a forensic population in high secure hospitals in the U.K. (Harty et al., 2004) conclude that it is possible to assess needs and future placement possibilities reliably in such a population. The literature review highlights a lack of understanding of the care needs of older forensic psychiatric patients. An audit of a specialist old age psychiatry liaison service to a forensic psychiatric unit (Shah, 2006) noted that placement advice was the most difficult to provide with a paucity of facilities willing to accept older patients with a forensic history, and the author stressed the need for a comprehensive model of specialist forensic old age psychiatry service at a regional and a supra-regional level. We believe that understanding the care needs of an older forensic psychiatric population will assist in developing and planning services for this group. An exploratory study was conducted with an aim to compare healthcare and placement needs of older forensic patients (over 60 years) from a high secure hospital and medium/low secure hospital. An additional objective was to assist in service planning for older forensic patients. All patients aged over 60 years and deemed able to provide informed consent in the units were approached, and those who provided valid and informed consent were included in the study. Fifteen patients each from the high and medium/low secure setting were examined using the Camberwell Assessment of Needs in the Elderly – Short Version (CANE-S) (Orrell and Hancock, 2004) and Camberwell Assessment of Need – Forensic Short Version (CANFOR-S) (Thomas et al., 2003). Placement options were also compared using forensic adaptation of the Nottingham Acute Bed Study questionnaire (NABUS) (Beck et al., 1997). Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected from the medical notes. This study supports the hypothesis that there are significant differences in healthcare and placement needs of the older forensic patients in a high secure hospital compared to those in a medium/low secure hospital. More than half of older patients in a high secure setting were transferred from prison compared to the majority of the patients in medium/low security hospital who were admitted from high secure hospital setting. Whilst the older population was relatively younger in the high secure hospital (61.5 years) than in the medium/low secure hospital (73.4 years), review of the clinical notes suggested that the former group had more physical health problems – notably poor eye sight, obesity and musculoskeletal problems. The older group in the high secure setting was more likely to be on antipsychotic medication compared to the group in the medium/low secure setting. When the needs of the two older groups were compared using the CANFOR-S in the “user” and the “staff” subgroups, the group in the high secure setting complained of more unmet needs than the group in the medium/low secure setting, especially