Two-Party Competition and Senate Politics: The Permanent Campaign on the Floor of the U.S. Senate
نویسنده
چکیده
Intense competition for majority party control—a continuous reality since the Republican Party won control of the Senate in 1980—has transformed Senate floor politics. This article shows how minority party senators have exploited floor amendments for partisan purposes to a much greater extent in the post-1980 period than in the past. During the 1960s and 1970s, floor activism was a function of an individual senator's stylistic choices and policy preferences, with more extreme senators offering more and more unsuccessful amendments, but party having no meaningful effect. During the post-1980 period, by contrast, minority party senators are considerably more active on the floor than majority party senators, and party has become a strong predictor of amending success. Indeed, the most ideologically extreme senators of the majority party are more successful in getting their amendments accepted than the most centrist members of the minority party.
منابع مشابه
Feminism and Abortion in the United States’ Party Politics
Abstract The feminist movement in the United States like other countries has tried to establish equality for women. From the first attempts to gain constitutional right for vote, up to the current radical demands, feminists have struggled to make changes in the U.S. party politics and obtain their rights within the parties. One of the important issues in which women played a key role in party ...
متن کاملThe Politics of Obstruction: Holds in the U.S. Senate
A defining feature of the modern U.S. Senate is obstruction. Almost all pieces of legislation considered in the Senate are affected either directly or indirectly by obstruction. Obstruction takes many forms in the modern Senate, but one of the most prevalent, yet least studied is the hold. Using a newly created dataset on Republican Senate holds from the 99th through 104th Congresses we cast li...
متن کاملThe Interdependence of Sequential Senate Elections: Evidence from 1946-2002
Among U.S. federal elections, Senate elections are unique in that each state is a two-member district where representatives are elected sequentially to overlapping terms. Models of the sequential nature of Senate elections have been proposed suggesting that the outcome of the election for one of the state’s two U.S. Senate seats affects the contest for the other. More specifically, these models...
متن کاملSenate Elections with Independent Candidates
Assuming strict two-party competition, policy balancing models of the US senate imply that senators from the same state will often be from opposite parties and have great ideological divergence. We analyze the effect of independent candidates on these implications. Our theoretical model implies the two state senators will generally not be from opposite parties and will be closer in ideological ...
متن کاملThe Representation of Small Parties and Independents
The Senate has become the active parliamentary chamber it is today largely as a consequence of the representation of minor parties. While the two large parties have supported major changes to Senate procedures and are the major players in the day-today operation of the Senate, it has been the existence of minor party and independent senators that has given the Senate its distinctive role. It is...
متن کامل