A Network Theory Study of Roll Call Votes in the United States Congress
نویسنده
چکیده
I study the U.S. Congressional voting record using network theory and computations. I encode the roll call votes from both the House of Representatives and the Senate for 1789-2006 into adjacency matrices (graphs) that encode the extent of agreement between any two legislators in a given House or Senate. I apply concepts such as modularity and various notions of centrality to the adjacency matrices and determine rank orderings of the Congressmen, giving insight into voting behavior and trends for certain individuals as well as changes over time for the entire Congress. I apply the same procedures to legislation cosponsorship networks and compare the resulting rank orderings. I also compare my results to the DW-NOMINATE rankings and look for correlations and patterns by computing party modularity and maximum modularity. I show that party realignments in U.S. history and that party polarization has become very prominent in the U.S. over the past few decades.
منابع مشابه
Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers
T o what extent does the separation of powers affect congressional roll call voting behavior? To answer this question, I offer a strategic model of congressional decision making that asserts members of Congress pursue public policy goals when casting roll call votes. From the equilibrium predictions of a formal model, I generate testable hypotheses by computing the expected net amount of sophis...
متن کاملs . so c - ph ] 1 9 Ju l 2 00 7 Community Structure in the United States House of Representatives
We investigate the networks of committee and subcommittee assignments in the United States House of Representatives from the 101st–108th Congresses, with the committees connected by “interlocks” or common membership. We examine the community structure in these networks using several methods, revealing strong links between certain committees as well as an intrinsic hierarchical structure in the ...
متن کاملA network analysis of committees in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Network theory provides a powerful tool for the representation and analysis of complex systems of interacting agents. Here, we investigate the U.S. House of Representatives network of committees and subcommittees, with committees connected according to "interlocks," or common membership. Analysis of this network reveals clearly the strong links between different committees, as well as the intri...
متن کاملLegislative Prediction via Random Walks over a Heterogeneous Graph
In this article, we propose a random walk-based model to predict legislators’ votes on a set of bills. In particular, we first convert roll call data, i.e. the recorded votes and the corresponding deliberative bodies, to a heterogeneous graph, where both the legislators and bills are treated as vertices. Three types of weighted edges are then computed accordingly, representing legislators’ soci...
متن کاملSenate Responsiveness in an Era of Inequality
To what extent do members of Congress respond unequally to people in different economic situations? While recent studies have found a responsiveness bias toward the wealthy (Gilens 2005; Bartels 2008), the extent of this bias remains unknown. Using data from the 2004 NAES, Census data, and multiple roll call votes, I examine Senate responsiveness across a range of issues for the 107 through 110...
متن کامل