Does Corporate International Diversification Destroy Value? Evidence from Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper investigates the valuation effects of corporate international diversification by examining cross-border mergers and acquisitions of U.S. acquirers over the period 1990-1999. We find that, on average, acquisitions of “fairly valued” foreign business units do not lead to value discounts. Consistent with the industrial diversification discount literature, unrelated cross-border acquisitions result in a significant diversification discount of about 24 percent after accounting for the valuation of foreign targets. Furthermore, significant wealth gains accrue to foreign target shareholders regardless of the type of acquisition. Overall, our results suggest that international diversification does not destroy value while industrial diversification leads to discounts even after controlling for the pre-acquisition value of the target.
منابع مشابه
Cross Border Mergers and Acquisitions by Indian firms-An Analysis of Pre and Post Merger performance
The corporate sector all over the world is restructuring its operations through different types of consolidation strategies like mergers and acquisitions in order to face challenges posed by the new pattern of globalization, which has led to the greater integration of national and international markets.. The intensity of cross-border operations recorded an unprecedented ...
متن کاملInternational Corporate Governance Spillovers: Evidence from Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions
We develop and test the hypothesis that foreign direct investment promotes corporate governance spillovers in the host country. Using firm-level data on cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and corporate governance in 22 countries, we find that crossborder M&A activity is associated with subsequent improvements in the governance of the target firms’ local rivals. This positive spillover ...
متن کاملFinancial market integration and the value of global diversification: evidence for US acquirers in cross-border mergers and acquisitions
Using theories of internal capital markets, this paper examines the link between financial market integration and the value of global diversification. Based on a sample of 1,491 completed cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&As) conducted by US acquirers during the 1990–2003 period, we find that, in general, US shareholders gain significant positive abnormal returns following the announceme...
متن کاملMethods of Payments and Cross-Border Acquiring firm Valuation
Consistent with the existing literature in U.S. domestic M&As, the methods of payment also seem to convey information about acquiring firm valuation in cross-border acquisitions. Cash-financing is associated with positive wealth gain upon foreign M&A announcements while equity-financing results in insignificant shareholder wealth increase. The fact that equity-financing does not lead to value l...
متن کاملMotives for Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions: Some Evidence from Danish Firms
This study addresses two questions based on Danish firms’ practices: first, what are motives for cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBM&As)? Second, how the external and internal factors influence the firms’ decisions? Based on the literature review, survey questionnaire and multiple-case study that were conducted amongst Danish firms, our empirical evidence supports that CBM&A motives are ...
متن کامل