Tracing Culpable Ignorance
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper, I respond to the following argument which several authors have presented. If we are culpable for some action, we act either from akrasia or from culpable ignorance. However, akrasia is highly exceptional and it turns out that tracing culpable ignorance leads to a vicious regress. Hence, we are hardly ever culpable for our actions. I argue that the argument fails. Cases of akrasia may not be that rare when it comes to epistemic activities such as evidence-gathering and working on our intellectual virtues and vices. Moreover, particular cases of akrasia may be rare, but they are not exceptional when we consider chains of actions. Finally and most importantly, we can be culpable for our actions even if we do not act from akrasia or from culpable ignorance, namely in virtue of our unactivated dispositional beliefs.
منابع مشابه
Is Ignorance of Climate Change Culpable?
Sometimes ignorance is an excuse. If an agent did not know and could not have known that her action would realize some bad outcome, then it is plausible to maintain that she is not to blame for realizing that outcome, even when the act that leads to this outcome is wrong. This general thought can be brought to bear in the context of climate change insofar as we think (a) that the actions of ind...
متن کاملNon-culpable ignorance and HIV criminalisation.
In this essay, I argue that any legal framework that addresses sexual transmission of HIV should be sensitive to the way that culpability can be mitigated by moral and factual ignorance. Though it is wrong to transmit HIV, public officials should be wary of criminalising transmission because people with HIV may be excused if they suffer from blameless moral or factual ignorance. I begin with th...
متن کاملBeyond Belief: Rethinking the Role of Belief in the Assessment of Culpability
The relationship between a criminal defendant’s mistaken factual beliefs and the various Model-Penal-Code-derived culpable mental states has long been thought to be confusing but essentially unproblematic. The confusion, it is said, arises from the courts’ unfortunate practice of “dealing with such mistakes as a matter of defense.” If the courts were to abandon this practice and treat the defen...
متن کاملCulpable versus non-culpable traffic accidents; what is wrong with this picture?
INTRODUCTION It is often implicitly or explicitly assumed in traffic accident research that drivers with accidents designated as non-culpable are a random sample from the population. However, this assumption is dependent upon differences in the criterion used for culpability. If drivers are erroneously categorized by assuming randomness, results could be grossly misleading. METHOD The assumpt...
متن کامل