Do decision-analytic models identify cost-effective treatments? A retrospective look at helicobacter pylori eradication.

نویسندگان

  • Kathleen A Fairman
  • Brenda R Motheral
چکیده

BACKGROUND Pharmacoeconomic models of Helicobacter (H) pylori eradication have been frequently cited but never validated. OBJECTIVE Examine retrospectively whether H pylori pharmacoeconomic models direct decision makers to cost-effective therapeutic choices. METHODS We first replicated and then validated 2 models, replacing model assumptions with empirical data from a multipayer claims database. Database subjects were 435 commercially insured U.S. patients treated with bismuthmetronidazole- tetracycline (BMT), proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-clarithromycin, or PPI-amoxicillin. Patients met >1 clinical requirement (ulcer disease, gastritis/duodenitis, stomach function disorder, abdominal pain, H pylori infection, endoscopy, or H pylori assay). Sensitivity analyses included only patients with ulcer diagnosis or gastrointestinal specialist care. Outcome measures were: (1) rates of eradication retreatment; (2) use of office visits, hospitalizations, endoscopies, and antisecretory medication; and (3) cost per effectively treated (nonretreated) patient. RESULTS Model results overstated the cost-effectiveness of PPI-clarithromycin and underestimated the cost-effectiveness of BMT. Prior to empirical adjustment, costs per effectively treated patient were 1,001 US dollars, 980 US dollars, and 1,730 US dollars for BMT, PPIclarithromycin, and PPI-amoxicillin, respectively. Estimates after adjustment were US dollars for BMT, 1,118 US dollars for PPI-clarithromycin, and 1,131 US dollars for PPI-amoxicillin. Key model assumptions that proved retrospectively incorrect were largely unsupported by either empirical evidence or systematic assessment of expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS Organizations with access to medical and pharmacy claims databases should test key assumptions of influential models to determine their validity. Journal peer-review processes should pay particular attention to the basis of model assumptions.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Cost-Effectiveness of Abbreviated Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Peptic Ulcer Disease

• Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness of abbreviated and conventional regimens for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease (PUD). • Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis. • Patients: Hypothetical cohort of persons with a diagnosis of PUD. • Methods: A decision analytic model using the thirdparty payer perspective was created. Three abbreviated r...

متن کامل

Helicobacter pylori screening for individuals requiring chronic NSAID therapy: a decision analysis.

INTRODUCTION Although it is incontrovertible that Helicobacter pylori causes peptic ulcer disease, controversy persists regarding the impact of H. pylori infection on the incidence of NSAID-related complications and whether H. pylori eradication reduces the rate of adverse events. METHODS A symptom-driven decision analytic model was developed to compare the clinical and economic impact of H. ...

متن کامل

Noninvasive Helicobacter pylori testing for the "test-and-treat" strategy: a decision analysis to assess the effect of past infection on test choice.

BACKGROUND Clinical guidelines support a noninvasive Helicobacter pylori "test-and-treat" strategy for individuals with uncomplicated dyspepsia. However, consensus is lacking regarding the preferred noninvasive testing method. OBJECTIVE To use decision analytic modeling to estimate the clinical and economic outcomes associated with noninvasive tests designed to detect either H pylori antibody...

متن کامل

Systematic review and economic evaluation of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment for non-ulcer dyspepsia. Dyspepsia Review Group.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate efficacy and cost effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia infected with H pylori. DESIGN Systematic review of randomised controlled trials comparing H pylori eradication with placebo or another drug treatment. Results were incorporated into a Markov model comparing health service costs and benefits of H pylori erad...

متن کامل

Cost-effectiveness of a 'score and scope' strategy for the management of dyspepsia.

OBJECTIVE It is important to identify the best initial work-up in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia because of its epidemiological and economical relevance. The objective of the study was to assess systematically the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of invasive and non-invasive strategies for the management of dyspepsia. METHODS A decision analysis was performed to compare prompt end...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of managed care pharmacy : JMCP

دوره 9 5  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003