Informed shared decision making in multiple sclerosis--inevitable or impossible?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Patients and health authorities increasingly claim active roles in health care decision making processes. As immune therapies in MS are partially effective MS is a prototypic condition for a shared decision making process. The treatment of acute relapses and the initiation, change or withdrawal of so called disease-modifying treatments are key decisions in MS management. We developed two decision aids following the phased approach of the framework of increasing evidence for complex interventions for these key decisions. In prestudies we found that 80% of MS patients demand autonomous roles in treatment decisions which contrasts with a poor knowledge of risks. On the other hand MS patients are not disturbed by evidence-based, balanced complex information. MS patients do understand this kind of information and are able to transfer new abilities to other situations. Currently we study the effects of a 4-hour education programme on relapse management versus an information leaflet in controls in 150 MS patients. In a second trial with n=298 MS patients we study the effects of an evidence-based patient information on immunotherapy on decisional role preference and performance in the patient physician encounter. Results in early 2007 will show to which extent patient education with a focus on evidence-based patient information influences participation in the decision making process.
منابع مشابه
Evaluator-blinded trial evaluating nurse-led immunotherapy DEcision Coaching In persons with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DECIMS) and accompanying process evaluation: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis is a chronic neurological condition usually starting in early adulthood and regularly leading to severe disability. Immunotherapy options are growing in number and complexity, while costs of treatments are high and adherence rates remain low. Therefore, treatment decision-making has become more complex for patients. Structured decision coaching, based on the princi...
متن کاملDecisional role preferences, risk knowledge and information interests in patients with multiple sclerosis.
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making is increasingly recognized as the ideal model of patient-physician communication especially in chronic diseases with partially effective treatments as multiple sclerosis (MS). To evaluate prerequisite factors for this kind of decision making we studied patients' decisional role preferences in medical decision making, knowledge on risks, information interests and...
متن کاملPatients' and Observers' Perceptions of Involvement Differ. Validation Study on Inter-Relating Measures for Shared Decision Making
OBJECTIVE Patient involvement into medical decisions as conceived in the shared decision making method (SDM) is essential in evidence based medicine. However, it is not conclusively evident how best to define, realize and evaluate involvement to enable patients making informed choices. We aimed at investigating the ability of four measures to indicate patient involvement. While use and reportin...
متن کاملبررسی میزان آگاهانهبودن رضایت کسبشده از بیماران تحت عمل جراحی زنان در یکی از بیمارستانهای شیراز در سال ۱۳۹۳
Patients have the right to make decision about their medical care. Thus, all the available information regarding decision-making should be provided for them. In surgical context, informed consent is essential for therapeutic relationship between patient and surgeon and sustains mutual trust and shared responsibility for decision making. Thus before surgery, the surgeon should describe available...
متن کاملEvaluation of Clinical Reasoning in Physical Therapy using the Script Concordance Test- Are we Measuring the Impossible to Improve the Inevitable..
Clinical expertise derived from experience forms the foundation of personal knowledge and skills which is a comprehensive part of healthcare professional’s clinical decision making in practice. 1 Physical therapy (PT) had evolved through an ongoing paradigm shift towards evidence-informed practice (EIP) in all aspects of clinical practice, academic education, scientific research and professiona...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of the neurological sciences
دوره 259 1-2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007