Collaborative Argumentation in Learning Resource Evaluation and Design
نویسندگان
چکیده
LORI (learning object review instrument) is an evaluation framework designed to support collaborative critique of multimedia learning resources. In this chapter, the interactions among reviewers using LORI are framed as a form of collaborative argumentation. Research on collaborative evaluation of learning resources has found that reviewers’ quality ratings tend to converge as a result of their interactions. Also, novice instructional designers have reported that collaborative evaluation is valuable preparation for undertaking resource design projects. The authors reason that collaborative evaluation is effective as a professional development method to the degree that it sustains argumentation about the application of evidence-based design principles. Pre-print: Nesbit & Leacock (2009). Collaborative Argumentation in Learning Resource Evaluation.
منابع مشابه
On the Benefits of Argumentation-Derived Evidence in Learning Policies
An important and non-trivial factor for effectively developing and resourcing plans in a collaborative context is an understanding of the policy and resource availability constraints under which others operate. We present an efficient approach for identifying, learning and modeling the policies of others during collaborative problem solving activities. The mechanisms presented in this paper wil...
متن کاملDesigning collaborative learning model in online learning environments
Introduction: Most online learning environments are challenging for the design of collaborative learning activities to achieve high-level learning skills. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to design and validate a model for collaborative learning in online learning environments. Methods: The research method used in this study was a mixed method, including qualitative content analysis and...
متن کاملAction context and target context representations: a case study on collaborative design learning
This paper focuses on the concept of representations produced in the context of collaborative design. More specifically, on the interplay between collaborative creation of sketches (design proposals), and argumentation and negotiation processes taking place in the design activity. The question raised in this paper is how sketches produced during a design session reflect and mediate dialogues an...
متن کاملCombining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC
Empirical studies and theory suggest that educational dialogue can be used to support learners in the development of reasoning, critical thinking and argumentation. This paper presents an educational design for synchronous online peer discussion that guides student dialogue in ways that lead to improved argumentation and collaborative knowledge development. This design includes a mediating inte...
متن کاملComputer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art
Argumentation is an important skill to learn. It is valuable not only in many professional contexts, such as the law, science, politics, and business, but also in everyday life. However, not many people are good arguers. In response to this, researchers and practitioners over the past 15–20 years have developed software tools both to support and teach argumentation. Some of these tools are used...
متن کامل