Auctions Versus Private Negotiations in Buyer-Seller Networks
نویسنده
چکیده
Buyer-seller networks where price is determined by an ascending-bid auction are important in many economic examples such as certain real estate markets, radio spectrum sharing, and buyer-supplier networks. However, it may be that some sellers are better off not participating in the auction. We consider what happens if sellers can make a take it or leave it offer to one of their linked buyers before the auction takes place and thus such a seller can choose not to participate in the auction. We give conditions on the graph and buyers valuations under which the buyer and seller will both agree to such a take it or leave it offer. Specifically, the buyer-seller pair will choose private negotiation over the auction if the seller acts as a network bridge with power over the buyer and if there are enough buyers with low valuations so that the seller does not expect to receive a high price in the auction.
منابع مشابه
Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis
Should the buyer of a customized good use competitive bidding or negotiation to select a contractor? To shed light on this question, we consider several possible determinants that may influence the choice of auctions versus negotiations. We then examine a comprehensive data set of private sector building contracts awarded in Northern California during the years 1995–2000. The analysis suggestsa...
متن کاملRisk aversion and optimal reserve prices in first- and second-price auctions
This paper analyzes the e¤ects of buyer and seller risk aversion in rst and secondprice auctions. The setting is the classic one of symmetric and independent private values, with ex ante homogeneous bidders. However, the seller is able to optimally set the reserve price. In both auctions the sellers optimal reserve price is shown to decrease in his own risk aversion, and more so in the rst-p...
متن کاملRisk Aversion and Optimal Reserve Prices in First and Second-Price Auctions1
This paper analyzes the e¤ects of buyer and seller risk aversion in rst and secondprice auctions. The setting is the classic one of symmetric and independent private values, with ex ante homogeneous bidders. However, the seller is able to optimally set the reserve price. In both auctions the sellers optimal reserve price is shown to decrease in his own risk aversion, and more so in the rst-p...
متن کاملAuctions Versus Negotiations Revisited∗
Auctions are compared with different forms of negotiation and bargaining. The value of an extra customer is shown to exceed the value of being able to ration supply, if the seller is otherwise unconstrained. Thus, we generalize and provide a simple proof of a result due to Bulow and Klemperer (1996), in which auctions and negotiations are compared. We also compare auctions and seller-offer barg...
متن کاملEffi cient Entry in Competing Auctions ∗
In this paper, we demonstrate the effi ciency of seller entry in a model of competing auctions in which we allow for both buyer and seller heterogeneity. This generalizes existing effi ciency results in the competitive search literature by simultaneously allowing for nonrival (many-on-one) meetings and private information. ∗We thank Andrzej Skrzypacz, our editor, and Jeremy Bulow for their help...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Games
دوره 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016