Broadband Internet: Net Neutrality versus Open Access
نویسنده
چکیده
“Network neutrality” and “open access” are two policies designed to preserve openness on the Internet. Open access mandates openness of conduits (e.g. television cable and DSL) to intermediaries (e.g. America Online), while network neutrality mandates openness to advanced content (streaming video, interactive e-commerce, etc.). We develop a systems model with free entry and competition in all three industry segments (conduits, intermediaries, and content) and examine the effects of the two types of regulation. We find that open access does not necessarily result in more openness of content and is not a substitute for network neutrality. JEL classification: L1, L5, L9
منابع مشابه
Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination
Communications regulators over the next decade will spend increasing time on conflicts between the interests of broadband providers and the public’s interest in competitive innovation environment on the internet. As the policy questions this conflict raises are basic to communications policy, they are likely to appear in many different forms. So far, the first major appearance has come in the “...
متن کاملThe Economics of Network Neutrality Are “ prophylactic ” remedies to nonproblems needed ?
| Winter 2011-2012 S ince “network neutrality” first appeared in policy debates, its meaning has been less than crystal clear. Some advocates have argued that net neutrality demands that broadband Internet service providers (ISPs) treat all bits equally: “a bit is a bit is a bit,” while others make exceptions for malware bits, spam bits, child pornography bits, etc. Some advocates have argued t...
متن کاملUnintended Consequences of Net Neutrality Regulation
Policymakers are in the midst of an active debate over how best to accelerate the build-out of next-generation broadband networks. The U.S. economy has a significant economic stake in the outcome. It is increasingly apparent in the global economy linked together by the Internet that the future competitiveness of individual firms, and indeed entire economies, depends heavily on state-of-the-art ...
متن کاملA Tale of Two Commissions: Net Neutrality and Regulatory Analysis
Two independent federal regulatory agencies, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), both claim regulatory authority over broadband Internet access. Both have actively explored the costs and benefits of “net neutrality” regulation since 2005, when a series of FCC decisions declared that broadband is an information service rather than a telecommuni...
متن کاملNetwork neutrality on the Internet: A two-sided market analysis
We discuss network neutrality regulation of the Internet in the context of a two-sided market model. Platforms sell broadband Internet access services to residential consumers and may set fees to content and application providers on the Internet. When access is monopolized, cross-group externalities (network effects) can give a rationale for network neutrality regulation (requiring zero fees to...
متن کامل