Ex-post Implementation and Preference Aggregation via Potentials
نویسندگان
چکیده
We introduce several notions of potentials for mechanism design problems with interdependent values, and relate them to implementation in ex-post equilibrium. Whereas ex-post implementation is closely linked to the ordinal concept of best-alternative potentials, the celebrated Vickrey-Clarke-Groves mechanism corresponds to the stronger notion of a cardinal potential: agents agree not only on the best alternative, but also on the quantitative di¤erences between all alternatives. We characterize all valuations that allow for cardinal potentials, and use this characterization for: 1) Identifying valuations for which ex-post implementation is possible; 2) Identifying classes of valuations for which all ex-post implementable choice rules correspond to cardinal potentials. The latter allows us to extend to interdependent valuations a result for dominant strategy implementation in private values settings, due to Roberts (1979).
منابع مشابه
Flipping and ex post aggregation
We show that Bayesian ex post aggregation is unstable with respect to refinements. Suppose a group of Bayesians use ex post aggregation. Since it is a joint problem, each agent’s problem is captured by the same model, but probabilities and utilities may vary. If they analyze the same situation in more detail, their refined analysis should preserve their preferences among acts. However, ex post ...
متن کاملInstability of 'ex post' Aggregation in the Bolker-Jeffrey Framework and Related Instability Phenomena
Suppose n Bayesian agents need to make a decision as a group. The group as a whole is also supposed to be a Bayesian agent whose probabilities and utilities are derived or aggregated in reasonable ways from the probabilities and utilities of the group members. The aggregation could be ex ante, i.e., in terms of expected utilities, or it could be ex post, i.e., in terms of utilities only, or in ...
متن کاملThe Ex-Ante Aggregation of Opinions under Uncertainty
This paper presents an analysis of the problem of aggregating preference orderings under subjective uncertainty. Individual preferences, or opinions, agree on the ranking of risky prospects, but are quite general because we do not specify the perception of ambiguity or the attitude towards it. A convexity axiom for the ex-ante preference characterizes a (collective) decision rule that can be in...
متن کاملOptimal Choice and Beliefs with Ex Ante Savoring and Ex Post Disappointment
We propose a new decision criterion under risk in which people extract both utility from anticipatory feelings ex ante and disutility from disappointment ex post. The decision maker chooses his degree of optimism, given that more optimism raises both the utility of ex ante feelings and the risk of disappointment ex post. We characterize the optimal beliefs and the preferences under risk generat...
متن کاملStrategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys
In some, but not all, contexts, respondents to stated preference valuation studies state a willingness to pay (WTP) higher than what lab or field experiments indicate is the actual amount they would pay. However, several ex ante survey design strategies and ex post calibration techniques can be used to minimize or eliminate hypothetical bias. This article reviews and presents evidence on the ef...
متن کامل