The Context for Vygotsky ’ s Work
نویسندگان
چکیده
That is, they view Vygotsky in light of the culture of his origins and then with respect to the culture that has evolved from the foundation he provided. Their aim is to contribute to an understanding of Vygotsky’s work by contextualizing and historicizing his own career and then challenging readers to understand how his work has been taken up, and most productively could be taken up, by subsequent generations of scholars who claim his influence and further claim to apply his principles. I say “claim” because, in the view of many who are well-read in this scholarship, assertions of a Vygotskian perspective are often tenuous at best. I too often see references to selected sections of Mind in Society (Vygotsky, 1978) that do not suggest a richer reading or consideration of either his own more extensive writing or the body of work produced by people conversant with his career project. Vygotsky sought to resolve the crisis of fragmentation that he saw in the psychology of his day. The crisis remains, as evidenced by the abundance of psychologies and their different foci available in the 21st century. Vygotsky’s solution was to propose and lay the foundation for a comprehensive psychology of human concept development. His ambitious plan included three central facets: It was fundamentally genetic (i.e., developmental), it relied on the premise that frameworks for thinking are social in origin and are internalized through cultural practice, and it used the axiom that mental processes are mediated by tools and signs (Wertsch, 1985b). Wertsch summarized a Vygotskian perspective as being concerned with human concept development as volitional, goal-directed, tool-mediated action in cultural context. Vygotsky has been cited to account for learning and development in many scholarly fields. Wells (1999) numbers among many who are concerned that these citations are often ill informed. He has commented (referenced in del Río and Álvarez’s chapter in CCV) that the often-invoked zone of proximal development (ZPD)
منابع مشابه
Versions of Vygotsky
The current prominent influence of the theories of L. S. Vygotsky on studies of education, particularly of pedagogic practice, requires a re-examination. The dominance of deficient editions of his writings has had regrettable consequences such as a misplaced reading of the ‘zone of proximal development’. The publication of his recent, albeit incomplete, Collected Works in English affords an opp...
متن کاملDewey ’ s Dynamic Integration of Vygotsky and
Contrary to the assumptions of those who pair Dewey and Piaget based on progressivism’s recent history, Dewey shared broader concerns with Vygotsky (whose work he never read). Both Dewey and Vygotsky emphasized the role of cultural forms and meanings in perpetuating higher forms of human thought, whereas Piaget focused on the role played by logical and mathematical reasoning. On the other hand,...
متن کاملD. Fonvizin\'s Literary Work in the Context of the Russian Culture of Catherine\'s Time (Problems and Perspectives of Studying)
The report is devoted to the analysis of directions in the study of D.Fonvizin's literary works, which developed in Russian and foreign literary criticism in more than two centuries of recognizing the comedian as a key figure in Russian literature of the 18th century. The problem of the integrity of the Fonvizin’s heritage in the school and university interpretation is posed; conclusions ...
متن کاملVygotskian and Post - Vygotskian Views on Children ’ s Play •
e authors argue that childhood played a special role in the cultural-historical theory of human culture and biosocial development made famous by Soviet psychologist Lev S. Vygotsky and his circle. ey discuss how this school of thought has, in turn, inuenced contemporary play studies. Vygotsky used early childhood to test and rene his basic principles. He considered the make-believe play of ...
متن کاملSociocultural critique of Piaget and Vygotsky
Piaget has su!ered a great deal of criticism that his theory of psychological development neglects the social nature of human development. Much of this criticism has come from researchers following a Vygotskian approach and comparing Piaget's approach unfavorably with that of Vygotsky. Smith (1995) refers us to Piaget's collected articles on sociology (Piaget, 1995) to argue convincingly that i...
متن کامل