Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment Report by the Decision Support Unit

نویسنده

  • Praveen Thokala
چکیده

Acknowledgements The author is grateful for financial support from the NICE Decision Support Unit (DSU). NICE had no responsibility or control over the content of this paper. This paper aims to look at the applicability of multi criteria decision analysis (MCDA) for health technology assessment. MCDA is aimed at supporting decision makers faced with evaluating alternatives, taking into account multiple, and often conflictive, criteria. This manuscript begins with a critical review of state-of-the-art methods for incorporating multiple criteria in health technology assessment (HTA). An overview of MCDA is provided and is compared against the current NICE (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) health technology appraisal process. A generic MCDA modelling approach is described and the most common types of MCDA models are detailed. The different MCDA modelling approaches are applied to a hypothetical case study. Finally, the issues that need to be considered for the application of MCDA in HTA are examined along with recommendations for future research. Most of the proposed MCDA approaches in literature use the same technique (weighted sum approach) which may lead to the researchers/health professionals assuming that it is the only relevant MCDA method. MCDA does not just stop at simple weighting and scoring; more flexible approaches are available that appear to be more relevant to the NICE appraisal process and value based pricing (VBP). There is a semblance between main MCDA modelling approaches and other techniques (such as programme budgeting and marginal analysis [PBMA], VBP and NICE recommended table of the summary characteristics). However, there are general practical issues that might arise from using an MCDA approach in the HTA process and it is suggested that appropriate care needs to be taken to address the issues identified in order to ensure the success of MCDA techniques in the appraisal process.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Use of Evidence-informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around The Globe

Background Evidence-informed deliberative processes (EDPs) were recently introduced to guide health technology assessment (HTA) agencies to improve their processes towards more legitimate decision-making. The EDP framework provides guidance that covers the HTA process, ie, contextual factors, installation of an appraisal committee, selecting health technologies and criteria, assessment, a...

متن کامل

An extended intuitionistic fuzzy modified group complex proportional assessment approach

Complex proportional assessment (COPRAS) methodology is one of the well-known multiple criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) frameworks that can focus on proportional and direct dependences of the significance and utility degree of candidates under the presence of mutually conflicting criteria in real-worldcases. This studyelaboratesa newintuitionistic fuzzy modified group complex proportional...

متن کامل

A spatial decision support system for prioritizing 22 Districts of Tehran for construction of multiplex buildings

A multiplex is a kind of urban cultural facilities which not only has several different rooms for showing films, but also provides other services such as a wide range of food and drink stores and free/easy available parking. Multiplexes have significant cultural, economic and social characteristics. Given the importance and advantages of multiplexes, several multiplex buildings have been built ...

متن کامل

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force.

Health care decisions are complex and involve confronting trade-offs between multiple, often conflicting, objectives. Using structured, explicit approaches to decisions involving multiple criteria can improve the quality of decision making and a set of techniques, known under the collective heading multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA), are useful for this purpose. MCDA methods are widely ...

متن کامل

A Decision Support System for Urban Journey Planning in Multimodal Public Transit Network

The goal of this paper is to develop a Decision Support System (DSS) as a journey planner in complex and large multimodal urban network called Rahyar. Rahyar attempts to identify the most desirable itinerary among all feasible alternatives. The desirability of an itinerary is measured by a disutility function, which is defined as a weighted sum of some criteria. The weight...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2011