Reputation-based Agreements: From Individual to Collective Opinions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Reputation mechanisms have been developed during last few years as valid methods to allow agents to better select partners in organisational environments. In most of works presented in the literature, reputation is summarised as a value, typically a number, that represents an opinion sent by an agent to another about a certain third party. In this work, we put forward a novel concept of reputation-based agreement in order to support the reputation definition, as well as, some desirable properties about it. We define a reputation service that collects opinions from agents, so creating agreements over situations. This service will also be in charge of presenting the information by using different informative mechanisms. On the other hand, we analyse how to enforce agents to send their opinions to the reputation service by adding incentive mechanisms. Finally, two different case studies are presented to exemplify our work.
منابع مشابه
An Axiomatic Approach to Bounded Rationality in Repeated Interactions: Theory and Experiments
This paper proposes an axiomatic approach to study repeated interactions between two boundedly rational players. Several axioms are presented: individual security; (strong and weak) collective intelligence; and internal stability. We characterize the axioms’ solutions and payoffs, classify stage games by the degree of sophistication required to satisfy strong collective intelligence, and presen...
متن کاملInformation-Based Reputation
Information-based agents use tools from information theory to evaluate their utterances and to build their world model. When embedded in a social network these agents measure the strength of information flow in this sense. This leads to a model of information-based reputation in which agents share opinions, and observe the way in which their opinions effect the opinions of others. A method is p...
متن کاملA multi-agent argumentation framework to support collective reasoning
Resum Argumentative debates are a powerful tool for resolving conflicts and reaching agreements in open environments such as on-line communities. Here we introduce an argumentation framework to structure argumentative debates. Our framework represents the arguments issued by the participants involved in a debate, the (attack and defence) relationships between them, as well as participants? opin...
متن کاملA multi-agent argumentation framework to support collective reasoning
Resum Argumentative debates are a powerful tool for resolving conflicts and reaching agreements in open environments such as on-line communities. Here we introduce an argumentation framework to structure argumentative debates. Our framework represents the arguments issued by the participants involved in a debate, the (attack and defence) relationships between them, as well as participants? opin...
متن کاملA multi-agent argumentation framework to support collective reasoning
Resum Argumentative debates are a powerful tool for resolving conflicts and reaching agreements in open environments such as on-line communities. Here we introduce an argumentation framework to structure argumentative debates. Our framework represents the arguments issued by the participants involved in a debate, the (attack and defence) relationships between them, as well as participants? opin...
متن کامل