Priming analogical reasoning with false memories
نویسندگان
چکیده
Like true memories, false memories are capable of priming answers to insight-based problems. Recent research has attempted to extend this paradigm to more advanced problem-solving tasks, including those involving verbal analogical reasoning. However, these experiments are constrained inasmuch as problem solutions could be generated via spreading activation mechanisms (much like false memories themselves) rather than using complex reasoning processes. In three experiments we examined false memory priming of complex analogical reasoning tasks in the absence of simple semantic associations. In Experiment 1, we demonstrated the robustness of false memory priming in analogical reasoning when backward associative strength among the problem terms was eliminated. In Experiments 2a and 2b, we extended these findings by demonstrating priming on newly created homonym analogies that can only be solved by inhibiting semantic associations within the analogy. Overall, the findings of the present experiments provide evidence that the efficacy of false memory priming extends to complex analogical reasoning problems.
منابع مشابه
Priming children's and adults' analogical problem solutions with true and false memories.
We investigated priming of analogical problem solutions with true and false memories. Children and adults were asked to solve nine verbal proportional analogies, three of which had been primed by Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) lists where the critical lure (and problem solution) was presented as the initial word in the list (true memory priming), three of which were primed by DRM lists whose cr...
متن کاملApplying analogical reasoning to introductory-level synthesis problems
This study compared the effect of two types of interventions on subsequent student performance with a target synthesis problem. Students either solved two single-concept problems (priming) or compared worked solutions across one of four different analogical reasoning conditions. These four conditions varied according to the type of examples compared (single-concept vs. synthesis) and structural...
متن کاملLooking for Analogies in Structural Safety Management through Connectionist Associative Memories
of the paper: Marco Lazzari, Paolo Salvaneschi, Luisito Brembilla "Looking for analogies in structural safety management through connectionist associative memories" Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Neural Networks for Identification, Control, Robotics, and Signal/Image Processing (NICROSP '96) IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996 Looking for Analogies in Structural Saf...
متن کاملNeural Associative Memories for Detecting Analogies: an Application to Structural Safety Management
This paper describes the first achievements and the future developments of an experimental application of connectionist hashed associative memories for realising analogical reasoning. The application field is the management of structural safety, where analogical reasoning is used to retrieve, given the current description of the state of a structure, the closest-matching cases stored in a case ...
متن کاملAnalogy and Relational Reasoning
Analogy is an inductive mechanism based on structured comparisons of mental representations. It is an important special case of role-based relational reasoning, in which inferences are generated on the basis of patterns of relational roles. Analogical reasoning is a complex process involving retrieval of structured knowledge from long-term memory, representing and manipulating role-filler bindi...
متن کامل