A comparison and combination of methods for OOV word detection and word confidence scoring

This paper examines an approach for combining two different methods for detecting errors in the output of a speech recognizer. The first method attempts to alleviate recognition errors by using an explicit model for detecting the presence of out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words. The second method identifies potentially misrecognized words from a set of confidence features extracted from the recognition process using a confidence scoring model. Since these two methods are inherently different, an approach which combines the techniques can provide significant advantages over either of the individual methods. In experiments in the JUPITER weather domain, we compare and contrast the two approaches and demonstrate the advantage of the combined approach. In comparison to either of the two individual approaches, the combined approach achieves over 25% fewer false acceptances of incorrectly recognized keywords (from 55% to 40%) at a 98% acceptance rate of correctly recognized keywords.