Book Review John Dewey’s Quest for Unity: The Journey of a Promethean Mystic

Richard Gale’s slender monograph is a sometimes insightful, sometimes enervating and always personal reckoning with John Dewey’s philosophy. Gale’s basic thesis is that Dewey is a unificationist malgré lui, that despite being committed to empiricism and pluralism his pragmatism remains profoundly metaphysical in a non-naturalistic sense. This claim is hardly new or surprising. Thinkers as diverse as George Santayana, Richard Rorty and John Patrick Diggins, to name but a few, have also noted traces of supernaturalism and monism throughout Dewey’s corpus. Moreover, recent works including Victor Kestenbaum’s The Grace and Severity of the Ideal (Chicago 2002), James Good’s A Search for Unity and Diversity (Lexington 2005) and Melvin Rogers’ The Undiscovered Dewey (Columbia 2008) have addressed the intersection of Dewey’s writings with spiritual and religious themes. Gale describes his own contribution as “a mere footnote” (26n9) to Steven Rockefeller’s John Dewey: Religious Faith and Democratic Humanism (Columbia 1992), an intellectual biography narrated in the long shadows of Dewey’s evangelical upbringing. Where Gale’s work stands out, however, is in its claim that Dewey’s corpus is incoherent unless significantly modified. As Gale sees it, Dewey’s work is shot through with a tension between his scientistic metaphilosophy and the “metaphysical” bases and aspirations for his theory of experience. On the one hand, Gale argues that Dewey denies qualitative experiences any cognitive value; on the other, he offers that Dewey’s privileged process of inquiry rests on intersubjective communication about qualitatively “felt” and ultimately ineffable problematic situations in experience. As such, Dewey’s endorsement of scientific method is incompatible with his aesthetic conception of inquiry. Therefore, either his methodology or his metaphysics has to go. Gale recommends that Dewey drop his infatuation with science and own up to his identity as a traditional metaphysician. The work’s introduction explains Gale’s systematic approach to Dewey’s philosophy and briefly lays out the general argument. Gale reads Dewey’s key con-