Issues and considerations regarding the use of assessment instruments in the evaluation of competency to stand trial.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Since the early 1960s, a number of instruments, reflecting a broad range of assessment methods, have been developed to assist in the evaluation of competency to stand trial. These instruments have taken various forms including checklists, self-report questionnaires, sentence-completion tasks, and interview-based instruments with and without criterion-based scoring. This article reviews these assessment instruments with a specific focus on their contribution to the competency evaluation process. Furthermore, relevant issues and considerations regarding the use of these instruments are outlined, including a comparison of screening versus assessment applications of these instruments, balancing standardized approaches with individualized assessments, the integration of instrumentally derived data with other components of a competency evaluation, and the communication of results to the fact finder. Each of these issues is discussed in relation to specific competency assessment instruments. Overall, we argue that each of the competency assessment instruments developed to date can make a contribution to the competency evaluation process and this article serves to delineate those areas in which these contributions are made.
منابع مشابه
Evaluating the Students Assessment in Residency Program Based on Competency Based Approach
Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the evaluation process in educational groups based on a competency-based approach. method: In this study, the evaluation of the program is based on a competency-based approach. For this purpose, the first stage of the evaluation was formulated as a (work sheet). Then, Blurinett developed a comprehensive assessment with an emphasis on a competenc...
متن کاملEvaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice.
Evaluations for competency to stand trial are distinguished from other areas of forensic consultation by their long history of standardized assessment beginning in the 1970s. As part of a special issue of the Journal on evidence-based forensic practice, this article examines three published competency measures: the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool-Criminal Adjudication (MacCAT-CA), the Eval...
متن کاملEugenics and Ethical Considerations Regarding the Violation of Justice
It is clear that technologies related to medicine and genetics, especially genetic engineering and eugenics, have grown significantly in recent decades. These advances have led to prevention of abnormalities and treatment of diseases. However, it seems the use of genetic engineering and eugenics and the possibility of irresponsible and profitable use of these technologies it's worrying. Hence, ...
متن کاملComparison of critical care nurses' clinical competency using self-assessment method and assessment by head nurses, Zanjan 2014
Background and Objectives: The high clinical competency of Critical Care Nurses (CCNs) is required, as the quality of nursing care in critical care units (CCUs) with critically ill patients is extremely important. This study was conducted to compare CCNs' clinical competency using self-assessment method and assessment by their Head nurses. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study wa...
متن کاملCompetently assessing competence to stand trial can be trying.
This brief commentary discusses the difficulties inherent in assessing competency to stand trial (CST), especially when attempting to match the use of instruments with the outcomes of clinical assessment. Suggestions for possible future lines of research are made.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Behavioral sciences & the law
دوره 21 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003