Public Sociology and Democratic Theory
نویسنده
چکیده
Sociology, as conceived by Comte, was to put an end to the anarchy of opinions characteristic of liberal democracy by replacing opinion with the truths of sociology, imposed through indoctrination. Later sociologists backed away from this, making sociology acceptable to liberal democracy by being politically neutral.The critics of this solution asked ‘whose side are we on?’ Burawoy provides a novel justification for advocacy scholarship in sociology. Public sociology is intended to have political effects, but also to be funded by the politically neutral state. He argues that public sociology is institutionally neutral, but that committing to an organic relation with a social movement is legitimate as a matter of the sociologist’s personal value choice.Although this produces side-taking sociology, by improving the case for particular standpoints it serves to improve democratic discussion generally, which is an appropriately neutral public aim.
منابع مشابه
The Nexus of Market Society, Liberal Preferences, and Democratic Peace: Interdisciplinary Theory and Evidence
Drawing on literature from Anthropology, Economics, Political Science and Sociology, an interdisciplinary theory is presented that links the rise of contractual forms of exchange within a society with the proliferation of liberal values, democratic legitimacy, and peace among democratic nations. The theory accommodates old facts and yields a large number of new and testable ones, including the ...
متن کاملReligious Culture and Political Action
Recent work by political sociologists and social movement theorists extend our understanding of how religious institutions contribute to expanding democracy, but nearly all analyze religious institutions as institutions; few focus directly on what religion qua religion might contribute. This article strives to illuminate the impact of religious culture per se, extending recent work on religion ...
متن کاملANC Dominance and Democratic Consolidation in South Africa
Robert Wieczorek is a senior Schreyer Honors Scholar, Paterno Fellow, and Strategic and Global Security Scholar majoring in International Politics with minors in Global Security and Sociology. He has interned for a United States Congresswoman, the International Center for the Study of Terrorism, and Toffler Associates consulting firm. Rob was inspired to write “ANC Dominance and Democratic Cons...
متن کاملThe fragmenting of the civil sphere: How partisan identity shapes the moral evaluation of candidates and epistemology
The 2016 U.S. presidential election upended a number of scholarly expectations about electoral politics. Many academics and pundits predicted that president Donald Trump’s flaunting of democratic norms, from his rhetoric on the campaign trail to his financial conflicts of interest, would undermine his candidacy. How do we explain Trump’s appeal to his core supporters and Republicans more genera...
متن کاملA Study on the Different Effect of Religiosity in General and Private Spheres of Life
Some researchers based on the distinction theory, believe that religious influence on other spheres of social life reduce and in spite of traditional life spheres lead by a set of its values, not by a coherent unit and driven by fragmentation theory of values. The effect of religion on public life and private areas such as work and family over the area of public policy is effective. The relat...
متن کامل