Connexive Modal Logic
نویسنده
چکیده
Connexive logic is a neglected direction in non-classical logic. In the present paper, first an axiomatic system of connexive propositional logic is presented. This logic, C, is shown to be sound and complete with respect to a class of relational models. It seems that this semantics is, in fact, the first known intuitively plausible interpretation of a system of connexive logic. The presentation of C suggests that connexive logic is constructive. It is a variant of David Nelson’s constructive logics with strong negation. In Nelson’s logics the verification conditions of implications are dynamic, whereas all falsification conditions are static conditions of falsification on the spot. In C, both the verification and the falsification conditions of implications are dynamic. This is enough to ensure that C is connexive and can be given a comprehensible and clear interpretation in terms of information states. In a second step, the language of the system C is extended by the modal operators and ♦ to obtain a connexive analogue of the smallest normal modal propositional logic K. Aiming at a connexive analogue of K that can be faithfully embedded by a modal translation into QC, quantified C, we arrive at a system that will be called CK, connexive K. The system CK is a connexive version of the constructive modal logic FSK characterized in [12]. CK is shown to be sound and complete with respect to relational models and to be decidable. We shall also critically discuss the evaluation clauses for the modal operators that are induced by the standard translation from modal propositional logic into first-order logic. In the context of the connexive base logic, the falsification clauses of formulas A induced by the standard translation appear to be intuitively implausible. In any case, both syntactic duality axioms ∼ A ↔ ♦ ∼ A and ∼ ♦ ↔ ∼ A fail to hold. It seems that CK is the first system of connexive modal logic considered in the modal logic literature. This paper may therefore be seen as a contribution to establishing connexive modal logic as a respectable branch of modal logic. Advances in Modal Logic, Volume 5. c © 2005, Heinrich Wansing. 368 Heinrich Wansing 1 Aristotle’s Theses and Boethius’ Theses The following principle is well-known as “Aristotle’s Thesis”:
منابع مشابه
When Conditional Logic met Connexive Logic
Conditional logic and connexive logic are two theories whose goal is the correct formalization of the way conditionals (i.e. sentences of form if A, C) are used in natural language. However, both approaches are never combined in the literature. I present here the first formal system which allows modeling the ideas behind these two approaches in a unique framework. Furthermore, the resulting sys...
متن کاملToward a structure theory for Lorenzen dialogue games
Lorenzen dialogues provide a two-player game formalism that can characterize a variety of logics: each set S of rules for such a game determines a set D(S) of formulas for which one of the players (the socalled Proponent) has a winning strategy, and the set D(S) can coincide with various logics, such as intuitionistic, classical, modal, connexive, and relevance logics. But the standard sets of ...
متن کاملSuhrawardi's Modal Syllogisms
Suhrawardi’s logic of the Hikmat al-Ishraq is basically modal. So to understand his modal logic one first has to know the non-modal part upon which his modal logic is built. In my previous paper ‘Suhrawardi on Syllogisms’(3) I discussed the former in detail. The present paper is an exposition of his treatment of modal syllogisms. On the basis of some reasonable existential presuppositi...
متن کاملA Note on Negation in Categorial Grammar
A version of strong negation is introduced into Categorial Grammar. The resulting syntactic calculi turn out to be systems of connexive logic.
متن کاملDialogical Connexive Logic
Many of the discussions about conditionals can best be put as follows: can those conditionals that involve an entailment relation be formulated within a formal system? The reasons for the failure of the classical approach to entailment have usually been that they ignore the meaning connection between antecedent and consequent in a valid entailment. One of the first theories in the history of lo...
متن کامل