View of Reactive and Deliberative Activity Marc

نویسندگان

  • Marc S. Atkin
  • David L. Westbrook
چکیده

The Hierarchical Agent Control Architecture (HAC) is a general toolkit for specifying an agent's behavior. By organizing the hierarchy around tasks to be accomplished, not the agents themselves, it is easy to incorporate multi-agent actions and planning into the architecture. In addition, HAC supports action abstraction, resource management, sensor integration, and is well suited to controlling large numbers of agents in dynamic environments. Unlike other agent architectures, HAC does not conceptually distinguish reactive from deliberative, or single-agent from multi-agent behaviors. There is no pre-determined number of cognitive \levels" in the hierarchy|all actions share the same form and are implemented with the same functions. GRASP is a multi-goal partial hierarchical planner that has been implemented using the HAC framework. GRASP illustrates two points: Firstly, that the same HAC mechanisms used to write reactive actions can be used to implement a cognitive activity such as planning; and secondly, that the problem of integrating reactive and deliberative behavior itself can be viewed as having to simultaneously achieve multiple goals. Throughout the paper, we show how HAC and GRASP were applied to an adversarial, real-time domain based on the game of \Capture the Flag".

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Universal Health Coverage: Broadening the Scope; Comment on “Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness”

Universal health coverage (UHC) is high on the global health agenda, and priority setting is fundamental to the fair and efficient pursuit of this goal. In a recent editorial, Rob Baltussen and colleagues point to the need to go beyond evidence on cost-effectiveness and call for evidence-informed deliberative processes when setting priorities for UHC. Such processes are crucial at every step on...

متن کامل

Interaction between reactive and deliberative tasks for on-line decision-making

To get actual autonomous engines or systems, it is necessary to equip them with on-line decision-making mechanisms: computation of decisions that fit the current situation, performed in parallel with real execution. However, such a computation introduces a contradiction between requirements on the quality of the decision and on the time at which it will be delivered. This contradiction is all t...

متن کامل

Integrating Reactive and Deliberative Planning in a Household Robot

Autonomous agents that respond intelligentlyin dyoamic, complex environments need to be both reactive and deliberative. Reactive systems have traditionally fared better than deliberative planers in such environments, but are often hard to code and inflexible. To fill in some of these gaps, we propose a hybrid system that exploits the strengths of both reactive and deliberative systems. We demon...

متن کامل

Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes – Learning by Doing; Comment on “Use of Evidence-informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe”

The article by Oortwijn, Jansen, and Baltussen (OJB) is much more important than it appears because, in the absence of any good general theory of “evidence-informed deliberative processes” (EDP) and limited evidence of how they might be shaped and work in institutionalising health technology assessment (HTA), the best approach seems to be to accumulate the experience of...

متن کامل

Searching for the Origins of Schwab's Deliberative Curriculum Theory in the Thoughts of Aristotle, Dewey and Habermas

The main purpose of this study is exploring the roots and foundations of Schwab’s deliberative theory in curriculum. Therefore, after examining this theory in introduction, its foundations and origins were investigated. According to this, basic assumptions of this theory are practical and quasi practical arts, eclectic arts, commonplace and collective decision. Aristotle’s distinction between i...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2000