Resident safety: the perspective of quality improvement
نویسنده
چکیده
F oster poses a fascinating dilemma when he asks the question: Would you admit your mother to the residency service? (1) It is fascinating not least because it causes us to reflect on our attitudes to patient centredness. Put bluntly, if we would not admit a family member to the residency service, then why would we admit any patient to this service? Foster’s perspective is also telling when he describes the behaviour of most physicians when one of their family members is admitted to hospital they become the ‘shadow attending’ ensuring that everything is done in the safest and the most evidence-based way. Unfortunately, having a ‘shadow attending’ for all patients would bankrupt the health service we need to think of ways of ensuring that all patients receive the best possible care. How will we do this without making healthcare impossibly expensive? The answer may lie within the quality improvement movement. The first step in improving the quality of care is recognising that it is not as good as it could be and that it could be improved. Training residents in quality measurement techniques is therefore likely to be wise. And measurement is not just something that should be done at the start and end of a project rather residents should understand the importance of continuous measurement as a driver for quality. After that, we should move away from the narrow thinking that there will only be one way to improve quality. Clinical interventions will be best in certain circumstances in other circumstances, educational interventions will be better and sometimes methods from improvement science will be most appropriate. Whatever the methods used, we should also think of quality improvement as a team activity. Care is increasingly delivered in teams in all specialities so quality improvement should happen in teams also and ideally in interdisciplinary teams. Rather than trying to impose quality targets from the top, it might be best to listen to residents and hear what they have to say about interventions to improve quality. Perhaps, most importantly, we need to value quality improvement activities amongst our residents. If residents see that quality improvement is perceived as a worthy endeavour but that the real rewards go to those who are involved in biomedical research or hospital management, then they will simply not take quality improvement seriously. We need to envisage a future where all applicants for senior specialist posts will be expected to have a section of the curriculum vitae describing their experience in quality improvement. Then we are much more likely to have residency services where we would be happy to have all patients cared for.
منابع مشابه
Duty hours restriction and their effect on resident education and academic departments: the American perspective.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Resident duty hour limits were implemented in 2003 by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education to improve resident wellness, increase patient safety and improve the educational environment of American residents. Now that academic anesthesiology departments and medical centers have had more than 3 years of experience under the duty hour rules, it is critical to ...
متن کاملInfluence of Training on Patient Safety Culture: a Nurse Attitude Improvement Perspective
Background and Objectives: Medical Errors and adverse events have recently turned into one of the predominant concerns of health-policy makers and health services providers. Promoting safety culture is fundamental to sustainable safety improvement in healthcare settings. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of training on nurses’ attitudes towards safety culture. Methods: A ...
متن کاملResident duty hours in surgery for ensuring patient safety, providing optimum resident education and training, and promoting resident well-being: a response from the American College of Surgeons to the Report of the Institute of Medicine, "Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety".
1) synthesize current evidence on medical resident schedules and healthcare safety, and 2) develop strategies to enable optimization of work schedules to improve safety in the healthcare work environment, . . . . [and] Consider also evidence on the safety of the residents, the education and training experience of the residents, the quality of the interactions from both the resident and patient ...
متن کاملReply to letter to the editor – ‘resident safety: the perspective of quality improvement’
the perspective of quality improvement' D r. Walsh emphasizes the importance of engaging residents in quality improvement processes. He outlines critical aspects of this engagement including recognizing opportunities to improve care, training resident in the use of continuous measurement techniques, working with interdisciplinary teams, and ensuring that goals are relevant to the resident's act...
متن کاملA Safety-II Perspective on Organisational Learning in Healthcare Organisations; Comment on “False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice”
In their recent editorial Mannion and Braithwaite provide an insightful critique of traditional patient safety improvement efforts, and offer a powerful alternative vision based on Safety-II thinking that has the potential to radically transform the way we approach patient safety. In this commentary, I explore how the Safety-II perspective points to new directions for organisational learning in...
متن کاملAttitude of Health Center Staff towards the Components of Patient Safety Culture and Assessing Patient Satisfaction, Amol, Iran
Background and purpose: Patient safety is one of the most important indicators of primary healthcare settings. There is a direct association between patient safety culture and improvement in healthcare outcomes. Also, identifying the factors that enhance client satisfaction could be of great help in improving quality of care. This research was done to investigate patient safety culture in healt...
متن کامل