Causal Models Interact with Structure Mapping to Guide Analogical Inference
نویسنده
چکیده
We recently proposed a theoretical integration of analogical transfer with causal learning and inference (Lee & Holyoak, 2008). A Bayesian theory of learning and inference based on causal models (Lee, Holyoak & Lu, 2009) accounts for the fact that judgments of confidence in analogical inferences are partially dissociable from measures of the quality of the mapping between source and target analogs. The integrated theory postulates a dual role for causal relations, which can guide both analogical mapping and also subsequent inferences about the target. It follows that depending on whether or not a mapping is structurally ambiguous, dropping a preventive cause from the target can either decrease or increase confidence in the same analogical inference. We report an experiment that yielded data in close agreement with predictions of the Bayesian theory. These results provide further support for the importance of integrating analogical transfer with the broader framework of causal models.
منابع مشابه
Causal Models Guide Analogical Inference
Computational models of analogical inference have assumed that inferences about the target are generated solely by “copying with substitution and generation” from the source, guided by a mapping based on similarity and parallel structure. In contrast, work in philosophy of science has stressed that analogical inference is based on causal models of the source and target. In two experiments, we s...
متن کاملInference processes in causal analogies
In recent papers, Lee & Holyoak (2007, 2008a, 2008b) argue that extant models of analogy fail to explain how people draw inferences from causal analogies. In the current research, we argue that structure-mapping theory sufficiently explains the analogical inferences drawn from these causal analogies, and that, contrary to L&H‘s claims, the effect inference can indeed be evaluated by a post-anal...
متن کاملAnalogical Inferences in Causal Systems
Analogical and causal reasoning theories both seek to explain patterns of inductive inference. Researchers have claimed that reasoning scenarios incorporating aspects of both analogical comparison and causal thinking necessitate a new model of inductive inference (Holyoak, Lee, & Lu, 2010; Lee & Holyoak, 2008). This paper takes an opposing position, arguing that features of analogical models ma...
متن کاملThe role of causal models in analogical inference.
Computational models of analogy have assumed that the strength of an inductive inference about the target is based directly on similarity of the analogs and in particular on shared higher order relations. In contrast, work in philosophy of science suggests that analogical inference is also guided by causal models of the source and target. In 3 experiments, the authors explored the possibility t...
متن کاملAbsence Makes the Thought Grow Stronger: Reducing Structural Overlap Can Increase Inductive Strength
Computational models of analogy have assumed that the strength of an inductive inference about the target is based directly on similarity of the analogs, and in particular on shared higher-order relations. However, in Experiment 1 we show that reducing analogical overlap by eliminating a higher-order causal relation (a preventive cause present in the source) from the target increased inductive ...
متن کامل