A comprehensive review of radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: outcomes, predictive factors, and grading scales.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) continues to present a challenge to neurosurgeons. The natural history of this condition, as well as the morbidity and mortality of therapeutic interventions, remains incompletely elucidated. Predictive factors and grading scales in AVM management allow risk-benefit analysis of treatment options and comparison of outcomes. Stereotactic radiosurgery is one of the established treatment modalities for AVMs and is generally used to treat lesions that are high risk for surgical resection. Radiosurgery aims to obliterate AVMs and thus prevent hemorrhage or seizure without any new or worsening of existing symptoms. Lesion characteristics and postsurgical complications differ markedly in patientstreated by radiosurgery versus microsurgery. Radiosurgery-based grading systems account for factors that have been associated with various aspects of radiosurgical outcomes including obliteration, hemorrhage, and postoperative complications, particularly those induced by radiation. The purpose of this paper is to describe the most current predictive factors and grading systems for radiosurgical treatment of cerebral AVMs.
منابع مشابه
Long term effects of Gamma knife Radiosurgery for treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations
Abstract Background: The Gamma Knife Radiosurgery (GKR) is an established management option for Cerebral Ar-teriovenous Malformations (AVMS). Therapeutic benefits of radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations are complete obliteration of nidus with minimal neurological deficit. Methods: Radiosurgery was performed between February 2003 and April 2010 at Kamraniye day clinic, Teh-ran, Iran, us...
متن کاملThe Publishing House Medicine of the Romanianacademy
The anatomic diversity of the cerebellar arteriovenous malformations requires a classification which is more surgically informative. The selection tools like the Spetzler-Martin grading system are best suited for the cerebral arteriovenous malformations, while they are quite inaccurate for the cerebellar AVMs. For this reason, in order to define the subtypes of cerebellar arteriovenous malforma...
متن کاملDiagnosis and evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations
BACKGROUND Ideal management of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains poorly defined. Decisions regarding management of AVMs are based on the expected natural history of the lesion and risk prediction for peritreatment morbidity. Microsurgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery, and endovascular embolization alone or in combination are all viable treatment options, each with ...
متن کاملCerebral arteriovenous malformations: the value of radiologic parameters in predicting response to radiosurgery.
PURPOSE To define the morphological patterns of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) that influence their response to radiosurgery at 2 years. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the yearly MR and angiographic follow-up studies in 102 patients who had radiosurgical treatment for cerebral AVMs between 1990 and 1992. Parameters studied were maximum length and volume of the nidus, positio...
متن کاملMultimodal Treatment Strategy for Spetzler–Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations of the Brain
The Spetzler-Martin (S-M) grading scale was developed to assess the risk of postoperative neurological complications after the surgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the brain. Treatment-associated morbidity and poor outcomes are particularly relevant to Grade III AVMs and improving the safety while attaining acceptable cure rates still poses a challenge. A multimodal treat...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Stereotactic and functional neurosurgery
دوره 86 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008