Preferences, the Agenda Setter, and the Distribution of Power in the EU
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we present a generalization of power indices which includes the preferences of the voters. Using a Multilinear Extension perspective (Owen, 1972a) we measure the probability of the players’ voting ’yes’ for a particular political issue. Further, we randomize the issues and show the influence that the Agenda Setter can have on a player’s power. We demonstrate these results using data from the European Union to show how the power distribution may shift after enlargement. JEL Classification: C71, D72, D78, H11
منابع مشابه
Jason Barr Preferences , the Agenda Setter , and the distribution of power in the EU
In this paper, we present a generalization of power indices which includes the preferences of the voters. Using a Multilinear Extension perspective (Owen in Manage Sci 18:p64–p72, 1972a) we measure the probability of the players’ voting “yes” for a particular political issue. Further, we randomize the issues and show the influence that the Agenda Setter can have on a player’s power. We demonstr...
متن کاملWho has the power in the EU?
The European Union (EU) is facing the challenge of enlargement to almost double its size; which has strong implications for the balance of power among member states. Building on the work of Shapley (1977) and Owen (1972), we present a measure of power that is based on players’ preferences and number of votes. We apply this measure to the Council of Ministers to see who wields power now and who ...
متن کاملStrategic versus non-strategic voting power in the EU Council of Ministers: the consultation procedure
This paper evaluates the distribution of power within the Council of the European Union from the a priori perspective of constitutional design using two distinct approaches: (1) applying traditional voting power indices; (2) carrying out strategic equilibrium analysis of the EU’s consultation procedure. It clarifies why both approaches lead to different power indications, and investigates the d...
متن کاملExtreme Agenda Setting Power in Dynamic Bargaining Games
In a general bargaining model with a fixed proposer, we show that the agenda setter’s equilibrium payoff is never lower than her payoff in the static model. There is a cutoff level of voter patience such that below the cutoff, the static equilibrium (possibly along with others) obtains; and above the cutoff, all equilibria are in mixed proposal strategies, and the agenda setter does strictly be...
متن کاملPower and Agenda-Setting in Tanzanian Health Policy: An Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives
Background Global health policy is created largely through a collaborative process between development agencies and aid-recipient governments, yet it remains unclear whether governments retain ownership over the creation of policy in their own countries. An assessment of the power structure in this relationship and its influence over agenda-setting is thus the first step towards understanding w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Social Choice and Welfare
دوره 28 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007