Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
نویسنده
چکیده
This article describes the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines that are intended to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, illustrating with examples from the Oncology Nursing Society journals and Putting Evidence Into Practice resources.
منابع مشابه
پریزما؛ موارد ترجیحی در گزارش مقالات مروری منظم و فراتحلیل
Today, understanding of systematic reviews and meta-analyses and their practical use is essential for who concerned with society's health. Most of the medical reports invoked to these reviews and statements and it is necessary for scientific experts to be familiar with their performing rules and the way of their writing. The basic sciences specialists and clinical professionals study them to ...
متن کاملA PRISMA assessment of reporting the quality of published dental systematic reviews in Iran, up to 2017
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proper scientific reporting is necessary to ensure correct interpretation of study results by readers. Systematic reviews (SRs) are of critical importance in evidence-based dentistry. This study assessed the reporting quality of published dental SRs in Iran.METHODS: The PubMed and ISI electronic databases were searched to collect published Iranian dental SRs up to the end of...
متن کاملThe PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations.
The PRISMA statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve the completeness of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors have used this guideline worldwide to prepare their reviews for publication. In the past, these reports typically compared 2 treatment alternatives. With the evolution of systematic reviews that compare multiple treatments, some of them only indirectly...
متن کاملThe PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinicians, policy makers, and other users. Since the development of the QUOROM (QUality Of Reporting O...
متن کاملچگونه مقالات مروری منظم و فرا تحلیل‌ها را گزارش کنیم
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره دوازدهم، اردیبهشت 1392، 88-87 چگونه مقالات مروری منظم و فرا تحلیل‌ها را گزارش کنیم How to report systematic reviews and meta-analyses محسن رضائیان [1] M. Rezaeian تعداد مقالات پژوهشی اصیل که در حوزه‌های گوناگون معرفت بشری و به‌ویژه در حوزه سلامت به رشته تحریر در می‌آیند، با سرعت شتابانی افزایش می‌یابند. برای نمونه...
متن کامل