Towards a Frequentist’s Approach to Pascal’s Wager

نویسندگان

  • Mary McGlohon
  • Robert J. Simmons
چکیده

Pascal’s wager attempts to provide a mortal with a proper choice of believing or not believing in a god, based on the expected reward of a given belief. It is essentially a Bayesian approach to the existence of a supreme being, as it deals with a degree of belief approach to proability. However, given the ineffability of a supreme being, the idea of finding a Bayesian prior for performing inference is impractical. However given the high population of observable mortals, a frequency probability would be a more obvious choice. Therefore, we present a systemized frequentist approach to the problem of a supreme being. Figure 1: Diagramming the utility in situations where there is a choice you have control over (&) and another choice you do not have control over (⊗). On the left, bringing wine when fish or steak may be served. On the right, believing in God when God may or may not exist.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Pascal’s Wager is a Lie: An Epistemic Interpretation of the Ultimate Pragmatic Argument

Piquant, convincing, powerful, and mildly heretical—Pascal’s Wager is a philosopher’s dream. But despite its initial appeal, the Wager seems to fail on logical grounds. In truth, it is a philosopher’s nightmare. Scholars scrutinize the Wager in isolation, using mathematics and logic to unravel the entire argument. But the Wager is neither a mathematical claim nor an isolated passage. Rather, Bl...

متن کامل

Pascal’s Wager about God [The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy]

Critics in turn have raised a number of now-classic challenges. According to intellectualism, deliberately choosing which beliefs to hold is practically impossible; according to the many-gods objection, Pascal’s wager begs the question and hence is irrational; according to evidentialism, Pascalian reasoning is epistemically irresponsible and hence immoral; and according to various paradoxes, re...

متن کامل

Taking Stock of Infinite Value: Pascal's Wager and Relative Utilities

Among recent objections to Pascal’s Wager, two are especially compelling. The first is that decision theory, and specifically the requirement of maximizing expected utility, is incompatible with infinite utility values. The second is that even if infinite utility values are admitted, the argument of the Wager is invalid provided that we allow mixed strategies. Furthermore, Hájek (Philosophical ...

متن کامل

Avoiding Environmental Catastrophes: Varieties of Principled Precaution

The precautionary principle is often proposed as a guide to action in environmental management or risk assessment, and has been incorporated in various legal and regulatory contexts. For many, it reflects the common sense notion of being safe rather than sorry, but it has attracted numerous critics. At times, proponents and critics talk at cross purposes, due to the multiplicity of ways the pre...

متن کامل

A Modern Pascal's Wager for Mass Electronic Surveillance

Debates about the moral permissibility of mass electronic surveillance often turn on whether consequentialist considerations legitimately trump relevant deontological rights and principles. In order to establish such overriding consequences, many proponents of mass surveillance employ a modern analogue of Pascal’s wager: they contend that the (negative) consequences of no surveillance are so se...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008