Public Opinion and Policy in Representative Democracy
نویسنده
چکیده
Edmund Burke was a much better political philosopher than he was a politician. Burke was a Member of Parliament for Bristol for six years, from 1774 to 1780. He visited the constituency infrequently during that time, and managed to alienate his electorate through a combination of his rather unpatriotic support for America during the war and a general lack of attention to the principal concerns of Bristol’s merchants. It was clear by 1780 – when he withdrew – that Burke stood no chance at reelection.1 Burke ’s political writings remain fundamental to this day, however, including his Speech to the Electors of Bristol. In his mind, an elected representative should seek and consider the advice of his constituents, but that advice should not be authoritative instruction. It should not serve as a mandate, dictating what a representative does; it should be but one input into his decision making. Burke’s philosophizing did not free him from the burden of representing the interests of his electors, however, and his ideas evidently had only limited appeal for Bristolians at the time. That is, Burke paid the electoral price. The situation is little changed more than two hundred years later. Active representation of the public’s policy preferences remains a – if not the – central concern in electoral and inter-electoral politics. Indeed, some argue that the tendency to represent public preferences
منابع مشابه
Democracy – The Real ‘Ghost’ in the Machine of Global Health Policy; Comment on “A Ghost in the Machine? Politics in Global Health Policy”
Politics is not the ghost in the machine of global health policy. Conceptually, it makes little sense to argue otherwise, while history is replete with examples of individuals and movements engaging politically in global health policy. Were one looking for ghosts, a more likely candidate would be democracy, which is currently under attack by a new global health technocracy. Civil society moveme...
متن کاملRisk Perception of Pregnancy Promotes Disapproval ofGestational Surrogacy: Analysis of a Nationally Representative Opinion Survey in Japan
متن کامل
Representative Democracy: Public Policy and Midwestern Legislatures in the Late Nineteenth Century
متن کامل
Democracy's Denominator: Reassessing Responsiveness with Public Opinion on the National Policy Agenda.
Democratic responsiveness concerns the degree to which government policies match public preferences. Responsiveness studies typically use national surveys to characterize public opinion, but whether poll questions overlap with the policy agenda is unknown. The first of two empirical analyses presented here, with hundreds of issues on the national agenda in the United States from 1947 to 2000, r...
متن کاملApplying Deliberative Democracy in Africa: Uganda’s First Deliberative Polls
Practical experiments with deliberative democracy, instituted with random samples of the public, have had success in many countries. But this approach has never before been tried in Sub-Saharan Africa. Reflecting on the first two applications in Uganda, we apply the same criteria for success commonly used for such projects in the most advanced countries. Can this approach work successfully with...
متن کاملAccountable democracy: Citizens' impact on public decision making in postdictatorship chile
Using a Santiago, Chile, health group as an ethnographic case study, I propose ‘‘accountable democracy’’ as an alternative normative project to the theory of deliberative democracy outlined by Habermas in Between Facts and Norms. Accountable democracy has at its center the impact of public-sphere opinion formation on decision making by officials in elected governments. [accountability, Chile, d...
متن کامل