Lost in Discussion? Tracking Opinion Groups in Complex Political Discussions by the Example of the FOMC Meeting Transcriptions
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is a committee within the central banking system of the US and decides on the target rate. Analyzing the positions of its members is a challenge even for experts with a deep knowledge of the financial domain. In our work, we aim at automatically determining opinion groups in transcriptions of the FOMC discussions. We face two main challenges: first, the positions of the members are more complex as in common opinion mining tasks because they have more dimensions than pro or contra. Second, they cannot be learned as there is no labeled data available. We address the challenge using graph clustering methods to group the members, including the similarity of their speeches as well as agreement and disagreement they show towards each other in discussions. We show that our approach produces stable opinion clusters throughout successive meetings and correlates with positions of speakers on a dove-hawk scale estimated by experts.
منابع مشابه
Social Media and Politics: Examining Indonesians’ Political Knowledge on Facebook
The Internet and social media have played a significant role in contemporarypolitical sphere of Indonesia. In particular, they have been widely usedfor political activism and discussion; but whether the discussions areconstructive is another issue. Constructive political discussion requiresseveral preconditions; one of the most important requirements is rationalreasoning. Citizens must be equip...
متن کاملExploring structural features for position analysis in political discussions
In the context of the NLP Unshared Task in PoliInformatics 2014, we analyze the structure of FOMC discussions as potential features for position analysis. We access the length of discussion statements and show that the distinction between long opinionated statements and short spontaneous discussion elements improves the analysis of similarity among speakers. Furthermore, we explore the structur...
متن کاملAn Argumentative Annotation Schema for Meeting Discussions
In this article, we are interested in the annotation of transcriptions of human-human dialogue taken from meeting records. We first propose a meeting content model where conversational acts are interpreted with respect to their argumentative force and their role in building the argumentative structure of the meeting discussion. Argumentation in dialogue describes the way participants take part ...
متن کامل(Un)Translatability of Persian Idiomatic Expressions to English in Political Discourse
The present study sought to investigate the extent to which Persian idiomatic expressions would influence the western translators' strategies in providing the ultimate product in English, and it also attempted to uncover the underlying assumptions in target text, then to suggest some weighty strategies to overcome difficulties with translation. For this purpose, the data was analyzed within the...
متن کاملComparison of the Effect of Mathernal Education via Newsletter and Group Discussion on the Nutritional Quality of Preschoolers
Background: Proposing an appropriate model of feeding behavior to mothers plays an important role in creating an accurate child feeding conduct. Studies have shown that mothers have low level of knowledge and practice regarding their childrens’ nurishment. Newsletter is an educational media providing families with easy access to information resources. Group discussion is one of the best ways to...
متن کامل