Incidence of appropriate cardioverter-defibrillator shocks and mortality in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with ischemic cardiomyopathy versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy at 33-month follow-up

نویسندگان

  • Kaushang Gandhi
  • Wilbert S. Aronow
  • Harit Desai
  • Harshad Amin
  • Hoang M. Lai
  • William H. Frishman
  • Martin Cohen
  • Carmen Sorbera
چکیده

INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to investigate at long-term follow-up the incidence of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks and of all-cause mortality in patients with ICDs with ischemic cardiomyopathy versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS ICDs were implanted in 485 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and in 299 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, all of whom had coronary angiography. Baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Follow-up was 965 days in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy versus 1039 days in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p not significant). The ICDs were interrogated every 3 months to see if shocks occurred. RESULTS Appropriate ICD shocks occurred in 179 of 485 patients (37%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy and in 93 of 299 patients (31%) with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p not significant). All-cause mortality occurred in 162 of 485 patients (33%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy and in 70 of 299 patients (23%) with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The incidence of appropriate ICD shocks was not significantly different at 33-month follow-up in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy. However, patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy had a significantly higher incidence of all-cause mortality than patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.002).

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Are implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks a surrogate for sudden cardiac death in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?

BACKGROUND Ventricular tachyarrhythmias long enough to cause implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks are generally thought to progress to cardiac arrest. In previous ICD trials, shocks have been considered an appropriate surrogate for sudden cardiac death (SCD) because the number of shocks has been thought to be equivalent to the mortality excess in patients without ICDs. The practi...

متن کامل

Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Therapy in Women-Data From a Multicenter French Registry.

BACKGROUND There are limited data describing sex specificities regarding implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the real-world European setting. METHODS AND RESULTS Using a large multicenter cohort of consecutive patients referred for ICD implantation for primary prevention (2002-2012), in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, we examined the sex differences in subjects' charact...

متن کامل

Say no to primary prophylaxis with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in asymptomatic nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy?

Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) is a common cause of congestive heart failure (CHF) and is a risk factor for sudden cardiac death (1,2). Although an asymptomatic patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy can now be approached with a reasonably established strategy (e.g., risk stratification using an electrophysiologic [EP] study in those with moderately reduced left ventricular [LV] funct...

متن کامل

Oversensing of atrial fibrillatory waves in a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Introduction Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to improve survival in patients with ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy when used for primary and secondary prevention settings. The limitations of transvenous ICDs include postimplant adverse events, defibrillator lead failure, and inappropriate shocks for atrial tachyarrhythmias due to fast ventricular response ra...

متن کامل

Heart Failure Bundle-Branch Block Morphology and Other Predictors of Outcome After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Medicare Patients

Background—Clinical trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) have enrolled a select group of patients, with few patients in subgroups such as right bundle-branch block (RBBB). Analysis of population-based outcomes provides a method to identify real-world predictors of CRT outcomes. Methods and Results—Medicare Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry (2005 to 2006) data were mer...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010