Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind
نویسنده
چکیده
Note: This paper was first presented as the University of London Special Lectures on Philosophy for 1955-56, delivered on March 1, 8, and 15, 1956, under the title "The Myth of the Given: Three Lectures on Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind." Reproduced with the permission of the University of Minnesota Press from: Wilfrid Sellars, "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind," in Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven, eds., Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume I: The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis (University of Minnesota Press, 1956), pp. 253-329. When the essay was reprinted in Wilfrid Sellars, Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963, pp 127-196), Sellars added a few notes which have been incorporated into the present version. I should also add that in the reprint British spelling was used. Republished as a separate book, Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, with an introduction by Richard Rorty and a study guide by Robert Brandom (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997). Republished in Willem deVries and Timm Triplett, Knowledge, Mind, and the Given: A Reading of Sellars' "Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind" (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Pub., 2000). French translation Empirisme et philosophie de l'esprit (Combas (France): l'Eclat, 1992). (This version follows the pagination found in Wilfrid Sellars, Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1963, pp.127196.) 127
منابع مشابه
Causality from western empiricism viewpoint, and its critique from transcendent philosophy viewpoint
Causality and its aspects is one of the fundamental issues in Islamic and western philosophy. In the modern west, some empirical philosophers like, Locke, Berkeley and Hume by empirical attitude challenged causality, that this subject is related to their epistemological principles in approach to objective and subjective facts, means empirical base of knowledge. Hence these philosophers denie...
متن کاملPragmatism, Inferentialism, and Modality in Sellars’s Arguments against Empiricism
In this essay I want to place the arguments of “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind” into a slightly less local context, by tracing further, into neighboring works, some strands of argumentation that intersect and are woven together in his critique of empiricism in its two principal then-extant forms: traditional, and 20 century logical empiricism. Sellars always accepted that observation rep...
متن کاملIndian Philosophy of Mind: A Comparative Study
In this paper I explore surprising parallels in the arguments between dualists and materialists in the philosophy of mind in India and the West. In particular, I compare the Nyaya School of India with Cartesian dualism and its Western defenders and the Carvaka School of India with contemporary Western materialists.
متن کاملThe Mind-Body Problem in the Origin of Logical Empiricism
It is widely held that the current debate on the mind-body problem in analytic philosophy began during the 1950s at two distinct sources: one in America, deriving from Herbert Feigl's writings, and the other in Australia, related to writings by U. T. Place and J. J. C. Smart (Feigl [1958] 1967). Jaegwon Kim recently wrote that "it was the papers by Smart and Feigl that introduced the mind-body ...
متن کاملZarathrustrian Mind: Some Comparative Reflections on the Philosophy of Zarathrustra
This paper deals with an essential problem which the modern western thinker faced with and tried to find a solution for that in the benefit of modern humanity. This problem is human reason and his free mind. The author tries here to go back to Zarathrustrian concept of mind and bring forth some fresh reflections in a comparative way. This will let him to evaluate in the main the view that argue...
متن کامل